The special counsel was being incredibly nice when describing the senator as a” friendly, well-meaning, old man with a poor storage,” according to the newly released record of President Joe Biden‘s two-day meeting with Robert Hur.
A lot of the Hur dialogue is littered with wacky responses and falling word combinations. Though, the readers is sometimes entertained by Biden’s nincompoop- y no sequiturs.
We learn about Biden’s Corvette—twice. We discover that the leader is a disgruntled designer but a skilled hunter. Biden also makes fun of the possibility of risky images of first lady Jill Biden.
However, his supporters might not be as impressed as they might think that the entire two-day interview is n’t a giant nonsensical rant. The leader is, however, entirely clear at occasions. And those are the days he’s likely lying.
When Hur released his report last month, for example, it noted that Biden could n’t recall the time his child died. Even one who is constantly trying to emotionally manipulate the public with false claims about the cause of his son’s death does n’t typically slip into a healthy person’s mind.
Recall that Biden feigned great rage about this discussion. ” There’s even a reference that I do n’t remember when my son died”, he barked at reporters when the report was released. How in the world would he attempt to boost that? Honestly, when I was asked the question, I thought to myself: It was n’t any of their damn business”.
According to the text, Biden raised Beau, the late son of Hur, and no Hur. The leader claimed that Beau had painfully passed away from brain tumor in 2015 and that he had believed he had died in 2017 or 2018 when he had painfully passed away in 2018.
Who knows? Biden might have forgotten what he said. Given the president’s lifelong fabullism, it is not completely undisputed that he purposefully floated the wrong date in an effort to defend his stealing of classified documents. Either way, it’s poor.
More important, Biden even contradicted himself when speaking about the paperwork themselves.
When Hur inquired about the secret papers in his hands, the president claimed that he “had no objective for them,” and that keeping them was against the law. But Hur, in his determined evidence for Congress, says:” We likewise identified another recorded conversations during which Mr. Biden read classified information loudly to his writer”.
Thus, the files did have a very distinct purpose. Those documents were used, according to Amtrak Joe, to support earn$ 8 million writing a text after leaving the Obama administration.
However, when the Hur report was released, the left wing did what they always do when confronted with awful information: They feigned a panic. They smeared the message. They concocted crime ideas. They denied real. They’re doing the same right then.
The media continues to portray Hur’s findings as an exoneration of Biden to counteract the ( correct ) impression that there is a strict, selective prosecution when it comes to the leaking of classified documents. Donald Trump, yes. Biden and Hillary Clinton, no.
Charlie Savage in The New York Times starts misleading readers by claiming that Hur had found “insufficient information to charge Mr. Biden” before launching his article on the leaked records. This is not accurate.
According to Hur’s statement, Biden appeared to feeble-minded to be found guilty by a jury for his decades-long disregard for confidential information. According to the particular lawyers, the leader had “willfully retained classified information”. And he had done it before he won the presidency.
During yesterday’s reading, Democrats erroneously used the word “exoneration” a number of days. Hur noted that the term “does not appear somewhere in my statement, and that is not my summary”.
COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS. Web
The Daily Signal publishes a variety of ideas. Little contained here should be taken to represent The Heritage Foundation’s opinions.  ,
Have an opinion about this content? To appear off, satisfy email , [email protected], and we’ll contemplate publishing your written remarks in our normal” We Hear You” function. Include your name, city, and/or status along with the URL or title of the article.
