The congressman stated that he would ask the president to give testimony “in the forthcoming days.”
President Joe Biden will be the next impeachment witness on House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky. )’s list, making him the biggest one yet.
Mr. Comer concluded a tumultuous March 20 hear with two former Hunter Biden associates by pointing out that the investigation into President Biden’s participation in his family’s business schemes had resulted in opposing testimony.
” Hunter Biden denies his family’s position in the Biden home business. This is a fabric contradiction among the highest order of witnesses. … At this point, the single people who can handle this discrepancy about Joe Biden’s membership in his mother’s influence- peddling schemes is Joe Biden himself”, the congressman said.
” In the coming weeks, I will ask President Biden to the Oversight Committee to give his evidence and discuss why his family, with his assistance, received tens of millions of dollars from international organizations,” he continued. ” We need to learn from the chairman himself”.
Ian Sams, White House spokeswoman for monitoring and studies, responded to the information on X, originally Online.
Joe Biden was the model, right?
The senator claims that he had no understanding of or engagement in the businesses of his family. But, traders Tony Bobulinski and Jason Galanis—both previous partners of Mr. Hunter Biden—refuted that state at the latest prosecution reading.
According to Mr. Bobulinski,” Joe Biden was the company that the Biden family was selling,” according to my immediate personal experience and what I’ve learned later.
Despite being buffered by a complicated system to maintain plausible deniability, Mr. Bobulinski continued, the president was an “active, aware innovator” of his family members ‘ business endeavors, conference with partners like him to advance the company.
Mr. Galanis, testifying electronically according to his present prison, shared corroborating evidence. He claimed that his former girlfriend’s says that he never engaged his father in business transactions were “patently fake” and that he was the only person who could understand their relationship as” the Biden lift” were true.
” And I think that there’s evidence that says that’s just an untruthful assertion”, he added.
No see they have spoken to has mentioned a reputable company that the Biden family offered in exchange for the millions of dollars they had received from international partners in nations like China, Romania, and Russia, according to Republicans.
Reiterating that discussion at the hearing, Mr. Comer asserted that the only logical conclusion to be drawn was that President Biden’s effect was the solution and that he was either” responsible” in his mother’s plans “or inept”.
The Epoch Times reached up to Mr. Hunter Biden’s doctors.
RICO Is No a Violence, You Say?
Throughout the reading, Democrats attacked the legitimacy of the Republicans ‘ witnesses.
Rep. Jamie Raskin ( D- Md. ), the leading Democrat on the Oversight Committee, derided Mr. Bobulinski as a “bitterly frustrated, aspiring Hunter business mate”.
Mr. Raskin also dismissed Mr. Galanis as a” prolific conman and convicted grifter” who was found guilty of “defrauding union pension funds, a Native American tribe, and results of innocent traders”.
Mr. Bobulinski sparred with his detractors. In one particularly heated exchange, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio- Cortez ( D- N. Y. ) asked him to identify the crime he claimed to have witnessed President Biden commit.
The businessman made the suggestion that the president had broken the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ( RICO ), the Foreign Agents Registration Act, and other anti-corruption and conspiracy laws.
” Excuse me, sir. RICO is not a crime. It is a category”, Ms. Ocasio- Cortez interjected, prompting a back- and- forth argument.
The RICO statute covers a long list of crimes in relation to racketeering and organized crime, including murder, bribery, wire fraud, obstruction, and more.
The congresswoman continued, calling the impeachment investigation a” Republican majority lost in the desert,” asserting that Republicans had failed to identify an impeachable offense.
Joseph Lord and Jacob Burg both contributed to this report.