<,? http processing =”UTF- 8″????? >,
Sign up for The Texas Tribune’s everyday magazine, The Brief, to stay informed about the most important news from Texas.
Republican House Speaker Dade Phelan promised to present” a very impressive solution” to the rising number of immigrants trying to enter Texas from Mexico in the early stages of the 2023 legislative session, which would put the boundaries of states ‘ responsibilities in immigration enforcement in perspective.
The House Bill 20 proposal, which Phelan teased, aimed to form a team of police and appointed citizens to guard the southern border. The policy, which critics said would enable “vigilantes” and endanger the lives of prison applicants and Spanish Texans, died when Democrats killed it with a legal strategy. And despite Republicans ‘ best attempts to resurrect a version of the measure, it never passed the governor. Greg Abbott’s office before the normal conference ended.
Senate Bill 4 allows any law enforcement officer to detain anyone suspected of fraudulently crossing the border, a boundary-testing immigration regulation that has been postponed in response to legal challenges, which has since been replaced by HB 20.
The viewer’s personal GOP primary has since refrained from reiterating the earlier suggestion, as his reviewers blame him for its fate in their wider campaign to portray the Beaumont Republican as too liberal and too polite to Democrats. Abbott’s Operation Lone Star, which includes building a position boundary wall, has been criticized for its “absurd” and “misleading” attempts to distract from his monitoring of other far-ranging border regulations and a report$ 6.5 billion spending spree to pay for the problems.
The speaker’s failure to cast a ballot on SB 4 has not been stopped by David Covey, the GOP activist and energy specialist who pushed Phelan to a May drainage for his House chair. Two of Covey’s most popular donors, original President Donald Trump and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, have echoed the exact harm.
House speakers are the only ones who have the power to decide whether a bill should be put to the floor. In other words, SB 4 could n’t have been passed without Phelan’s approval. In a blog, the speaker claimed that SB 4 was” the nation’s strongest border security rules.” It would allow judges to purchase people’s removal and give them the authority to deport people they suspect of entering the state from a foreign country, largely granting deportation powers that the federal government has long coveted.
The way immigration is interfering with Phelan’s main serves as a powerful illustration of where things are in Texas politicians: the issue is being used as a tool to undermine the political career of a Republican speech whose history includes an eightfold increase in Texas ‘ border security investing and the passage of laws that significantly expand position law enforcement’s immigration position.
According to Matthew Wilson, a professor of political science at Southern Methodist University, it’s no surprise that Covey is trying to persuade voters that he is more interested in border issues than Phelan, given that “poll after poll shows that Republicans are primarily concerned about immigration and border issues.”
Even after supporting the entire slate of border legislation that passed the Legislature last year, many of Phelan’s Republican allies have experienced similar debacles. In the May runoffs, Phelan and several other incumbents are attempting to prevent the record number of House Republicans who were ousted in the last month’s GOP primary, which is likely a result of this strategy.
Phelan is the first House speaker to be forced into a primary runoff in 52 years. The speaker is chosen by the 150-member House when lawmakers convene in Austin every other year, so who will hold the speaker’s gavel in January will be determined by the outcome of Phelan’s race.
State Representative Jacey Jetton, a Republican from Richmond who carried a border wall bill last fall, called the immigration-focused attacks on Phelan and other Republicans “absurd.”
Jetton, who was defeated in his primary by insurance adjuster Matt Morgan, a fervent Phelan critic, said,” If the governor felt we could be doing more, we would be in a special session right now.”
The passing of HB 20 also aligns with one of Covey’s main points, which is that the speaker has given Democrats too much power by appointing them to chair nearly a quarter of the chamber’s standing committees and refusing to shield GOP bills from parliamentary attacks.
A Phelan spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. The speaker has argued that allowing Democrats to control some committees helps the Legislature avoid gridlock in the manner of Congress without putting up conservative priorities. Additionally, he removed Democratic chairs from his list in 2023 from that same year.
A difficult defense
Wilson said Phelan may find it challenging to parry the attacks on his border record because his defense involves parliamentary nuance issues.
In our contemporary politics, Wilson said,” Deceptive and misguided attacks are the norm today.” There are many allegations that are unfair and deceptive being thrown back and forth between politicians, and it’s difficult to educate the electorate, especially when dealing with procedural inside-balls.
Phelan has tried to push back through his social media channels, arguing that Covey’s SB 4 criticism means he either” ]knows ] the truth and]is ] still making the choice to lie to HD 21 voters” or” ]lacks ] a basic high- school- civics- level understanding of our legislative process”.
Additionally, the speaker recently released an ad that features footage of him surveying the border in a helicopter while the narrator claims that he “has stepped up to help secure our border.”
Covey, asked about Phelan’s response, said the speaker” can attempt to explain away his previous comments and actions, but at the end of the day, the facts are clear”. He claimed that Phelan “was vocal about his opposition to SB 4 during the legislative process” and that he now “is trying to take credit for it” for the fact that he “knows his seat is in jeopardy.”
Covey argued that Phelan’s defense rings hollow because he voted to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton last year, despite the fact that speakers hardly ever cast ballots.
Although” Phelan felt strongly enough to support a hurried impeachment process, he was unable to find the will to support SB 4, which shields Texas families from the chaos at our southern border,” Covey said.
According to Covey, Phelan and Patrick, the Senate leader, argued over a crucial aspect of the bill, namely what to do with migrants who are detained for “illegal entry.” This is where Covey’s claim is rooted. While the two chambers were in agreement on the majority of the bill, the Senate suggested that every immigrant detained should be imprisoned until the “extent feasible,” which Phelan claimed would be too expensive and result in a” state-funded hospitality program for illegal immigrants.” Shortly thereafter, the two chambers came to a compromise.
Covey has suggested that Phelan was opposed to SB 4 overall, pointing to the speaker’s criticism of the earlier Senate draft.
” The speaker’s purview”
Due to the defeat of HB 20, a sort of” Border Protection Unit” to “deter and repel” immigrants between ports of entry, GOP immigration hardliners were already skeptical of Phelan. Additionally, it sought to make a more severe felony trespass charge for anyone found “knowingly entering” Texas from a “neighboring jurisdiction.”
Some immigration hawks viewed the bill as a bold and necessary response to the increase in migrant crossings, which allowed deputized everyday citizens to serve with licensed peace officers on the unit. Democrats and advocates for immigration said it would encourage racial profiling and put a risk on immigrants and legal residents.
House Democrats defeated HB 20 by passing a point of order, a tactic frequently employed to thwart legislation that passes on technical issues near the end of a session. Although some claimed the House parliamentarian’s recommendation was flawed and that Phelan should have overruled the parliamentarian, who serves as a sort of referee for legislative disputes, Phelan upheld the request.
According to Andrew Cates, an Austin attorney and expert in parliamentary procedure at the Legislature, the speaker employs parliamentarians to draft decisions on points of order” so that they concord with precedent” and adhere to the House rules approved by members at the start of each session.
” Technically, any rulings on points of order come from the speaker himself”, Cates said. The parliamentarian provides recommendations on House rules issues to his staff. The declaration of rulings is entirely in the speaker’s purview”.
With HB 20 and other points of order, Phelan theoretically could have overridden the parliamentarian’s decision and ordered a different ruling, Cates said. But that sort of move could be politically fraught, he added, citing former Speaker Tom Craddick’s refusal in 2007 to allow a vote on whether to remove him from power, which led to his parliamentarian’s resignation and, ultimately, the end of his speakership.
In any case, the Legislature eventually passed SB 4, along with a second bill that would impose harsher penalties for those found guilty of bringing illegal immigrants into or operating a stash house. The last change was effective earlier this year.
Additionally, lawmakers agreed to spend more than$ 6 billion over the course of the next two years on various border security initiatives, the majority of which are used to detain and jail immigrants through Operation Lone Star and build a wall along Texas-Mexico’s border.
” The Texas House has delivered under Speaker Phelan and the Republicans in the House made that happen”, Jetton, the ousted House Republican, said. Candidates who say otherwise are deceiving voters for their own gain, and they should beware of such obscene schemes.
Disclosure: Southern Methodist University has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a comprehensive list of them right here.
We ca n’t wait to welcome you to downtown Austin Sept. 5- 7 for the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival! Join us at Texas ‘ breakout politics and policy event as we dig into the 2024 elections, state and national politics, the state of democracy, and so much more. Members of the Tribune will save a lot when tickets go on sale this spring. Donate to renew or join today.
