Sign up for The Texas Tribune’s regular magazine, The Brief, to stay informed about the most important news from Texas.
Republican House Speaker Dade Phelan promised to existing” a pretty impressive answer” to the rising number of immigrants entering Texas from Mexico at the beginning of the 2023 legislative session, pushing the boundaries of the state ‘ responsibilities in immigration protection.
House Bill 20, the plan Phelan teased, aimed to form a force of law enforcement and appointed citizens to guard the southern boundary. The policy, which critics said may enable “vigilantes” and endanger the lives of asylum seekers and Spanish Texans, died when Democrats killed it with a legal strategy. And despite Republicans ‘ best attempts to resurrect a variant of the measure, it never passed the governor. Greg Abbott’s office before the normal treatment ended.
Senate Bill 4 allows any law enforcement officer to detain anyone suspected of fraudulently crossing the border, a boundary-testing immigration regulation that has been put on hold due to legal challenges, and has since been replaced by HB 20.
However, the original proposal has since surfaced in the speaker’s individual GOP main as his critics point fingers at him for causing the Beaumont Republican to appear too soft on the border and extremely polite to Democrats. Abbott’s$ 6.5 billion spending spree, which includes building a state border walls, has been criticized as “absurd” and “misleading” attempt to distract from his oversight of another, far-ranging border laws and his oversight of Abbott’s “operation Lone Star,” which includes enacting a state border wall.
That has n’t stopped David Covey, the GOP activist and energy consultant who pushed Phelan into a May runoff for his House seat, from also criticizing the speaker for omitting a vote on SB 4, from doing so. Two of Covey’s most popular donors, original President Donald Trump and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, have echoed the exact strike.
House speakers are the only ones who have the power to decide whether a bill should be put to the floor. In other words, SB 4 could n’t have been passed without Phelan’s approval. In a blog praising SB 4 as” the strongest border security laws in the country,” the speaker argued in favor of SB 4. It would allow judges to purchase people’s removal and give them the authority to deport people they suspect of entering the state from a foreign country, largely granting deportation powers that the federal government has long coveted.
The way multiculturalism is interfering with Phelan’s major is a striking illustration of how Texas politics is currently divided: a Republican speaker’s record includes an eightfold increase in border security spending and the passage of laws that significantly expand state law enforcement’s recruitment role.
Given that “poll after poll shows that Republicans are a czar of immigrants and border issues are a central concern,” Matthew Wilson, a professor of political science at Southern Methodist University, said it should n’t surprise Covey is trying to persuade voters that he is more committed to border issues than Phelan.
Some of Phelan’s Republican supporters have experienced similar repercussions after supporting the entire border bill that passed the Legislature last year. In the May runoffs, Phelan and several other occupants are trying to prevent the record number of House Republicans who were ousted in the last month’s GOP primary, which is probably a result of this strategy.
Phelan is forced to participate in a major runoff for the first time in 52 years. The speaker is chosen by the 150-member House when lawmakers convene in Austin every other year, so who will hold the speaker’s hand in January may be determined by the outcome of Phelan’s competition.
The immigration-focused strikes on Phelan and other Democrats are “absurd,” according to state representative Jacey Jetton, a Republican from Richmond who carried a bill last fall that authorized$ 1.5 billion for the border wall.
Jetton, who was defeated in his primary by plan appraiser Matt Morgan, a fervent Phelan writer, said,” If the government felt we could be doing more, we would be in a special session right now.”
The demise of HB 20 likewise aligns with one of Covey’s key points, namely that the speaker has given Democrats too little energy by appointing them to chair almost one-quarter of the chamber’s standing committees, a historic custom, and declining to protect GOP bills from political attacks.
A Phelan director did not respond to a request for comment. The loudspeaker has argued that allowing Democrats to control some commissions helps the Legislature prevent chaos in the manner of Congress without putting up conservative priorities. Additionally, he appointed fewer Democrat seats in 2023 than he did two years prior.
A hard security
Wilson said Phelan perhaps find it challenging to parry the attacks on his borders record because his defence involves political complexity issues.
In our modern politics, “deceptive and deceptive attacks are the order of today,” Wilson said. There are many allegations that are thrown back and forth between politicians that are cruel and deceptive, and it’s frequently difficult, especially when you’re dealing with legal inside-ball ball stuff, to educate the electorate.
Phelan has tried to push back through his social media channels, arguing that Covey’s SB 4 criticism means he either” ]knows ] the truth and]is ] still making the choice to lie to HD 21 voters” or” ]lacks ] a basic high- school- civics- level understanding of our legislative process”.
Additionally, the listener recently released an advertisement that features images of him flying over the border while the speaker claims that he “has stepped up to help safe our border.”
Covey, asked about Phelan’s answer, said the speech” may attempt to explain away his past comments and activities, but at the end of the day, the details are obvious”. He claimed that Phelan “was outspoken about his opposition to SB 4 during the congressional process” and that he now “knows his seat is in trouble, so he is trying to take breaks for it”
Covey argued that Phelan’s security jewelry lifeless because he voted to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton last time, despite the fact that listeners hardly ever cast ballots.
Although” Phelan felt strongly enough to support a hurried impeachment process, he was unable to find the will to support SB 4, which shields Texas people from the chaos at our southern border,” Covey said.
Covey’s claim that Phelan when opposed SB 4 stems from a disagreement between Phelan and Patrick, the president of the Senate, regarding a crucial aspect of the expenses: what to do with migrants after they were detained for “illegal entry.” While the two chambers were in agreement on the majority of the bill, the Senate suggested that every immigrant detained should be imprisoned until the “extent feasible,” which Phelan claimed would be too expensive and result in a” state-funded hospitality program for illegal immigrants.” The two tanks came to an agreement soon after.
Covey has suggested that Phelan was opposed to SB 4 nevertheless, pointing to the author’s censure of the earlier Senate review.
” The viewer’s scope”
Due to the beat of HB 20, a sort of” Border Protection Unit” to “deter and fight” immigrants between ports of entry, GOP immigration secularists were already wary of Phelan. Additionally, it sought to make a more severe criminal trespass demand for people found “knowingly entering” Texas from a “neighboring control.”
Some immigration hawks viewed the act as a strong and necessary response to the increase in migrant crossings, which allowed deputized regular citizens to serve alongside licensed serenity officers on the device. Democrats and advocates for immigration said it would encourage racial profiling and put a risk on immigrants and legal residents.
House Democrats used a point of order maneuver, which is frequently used to thwart legislation that passes at the end of a session, to kill HB 20. Although some claimed the House parliamentarian’s recommendation was flawed and that Phelan should have overruled the parliamentarian, who serves as a sort of referee for legislative disputes, Phelan upheld the request.
According to Andrew Cates, an Austin attorney and expert in parliamentary procedure at the Legislature, the speaker employs parliamentarians to draft decisions on points of order” so that they concord with precedent” and adhere to the House rules approved by members at the start of each session.
” Technically, any rulings on points of order come from the speaker himself”, Cates said. The parliamentarian is a member of his team and provides recommendations on House rules issues. The declaration of rulings is entirely in the speaker’s purview”.
With HB 20 and other points of order, Phelan theoretically could have overridden the parliamentarian’s decision and ordered a different ruling, Cates said. But that sort of move could be politically fraught, he added, citing former Speaker Tom Craddick’s refusal in 2007 to allow a vote on whether to remove him from power, which led to his parliamentarian’s resignation and, ultimately, the end of his speakership.
In any case, the Legislature eventually passed SB 4, along with a second bill that would impose harsher penalties for those found guilty of bringing illegal immigrants into or operating a stash house. The last change was effective earlier this year.
Additionally, lawmakers agreed to spend more than$ 6 billion on various border security initiatives over the course of Operation Lone Star, which includes constructing a wall along Texas-Mexico’s border, and spending it on various projects.
” The Texas House has delivered under Speaker Phelan and the Republicans in the House made that happen”, Jetton, the ousted House Republican, said. Candidates who say otherwise are deceiving voters for their own gain, and they should steer clear of such shady schemes.
Disclosure: Southern Methodist University has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a list of all of them right here.
We ca n’t wait to welcome you to downtown Austin Sept. 5- 7 for the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival! Join us at Texas ‘ breakout politics and policy event as we dig into the 2024 elections, state and national politics, the state of democracy, and so much more. Tribune members will save a lot when tickets go on sale in the spring. Join or renew today.
