To the Editor:
The discussion about improper immigration has reached fever pitch all over the country. The country has also witnessed the continued effects of additional illegal immigrants who have entered with malicious intent, in addition to the thousands of migrants looking for a better method of life in the United States. The nation was informed earlier this year that a identified gang member and an illegal immigrant had killed an innocent 22-year-old nursing student named Laken Riley.
The information of the event were horrible. The fact that Laken Riley’s criminal, an illegal immigrant, was recently identified by federal and local government as having unlawfully entered the country is another disgusting. Astonishingly, he was finally released. According to subsequent reports, he was finally detained in New York City before being released, ultimately leading to Laken Riley’s death in Georgia.
Seven unlawful immigrants were detained in January after fiercely attacking NYPD officials in Times Square, but they were never freed. Prior to Mayor Eric Adams ‘ recent changes to relevant laws, New York City had been known as a shelter city.
Tragically, these kinds of incidents have become all too common in the United States. The Federation for American Immigration Reform’s ( FAIR ) website provides abundant evidence of instances where illegal immigrants have harmed or killed innocent Americans. It should not continue to exist because of this.
I’ve persistently warned my coworkers and the general public that it’s not just “if,” but rather “when” Connecticut may experience the effects of an unprotected southern border. While some may accuse me of dread peddling, the stories and changes are apparent to fair spectators. Only last month, the U. S. Department of Defense, under President Biden’s management, acknowledged the likelihood of a large movement of Haitian immigrants due to ongoing turmoil in their household state. The pressing issue remains: How many of these workers will have legal backgrounds?
Liberal states like Connecticut appear to be stimulating fluorescent welcome signs inadvertently encouraging illegal entry despite the flashing red warning lights that may accompany large-scale illegal immigration.
The journey began in 2014 with the legislature’s passage of” Drive- Merely” licenses especially tailored for unlawful immigrants—a bill I regularly opposed and after repeatedly fought to repeal. Connecticut has since added a number of other opportunities to its laws.
Yet more concerning is the fact that Connecticut Democrats have taken the position of welcoming those with legal histories as well as those who are illegal immigrants.
A healthy approach that acknowledges the humanitarian ramifications of immigration while protecting our societies is necessary. We may find common ground to resolve this complicated issue without downgrading health or the rule of law.
In 2019, Connecticut effectively transformed into a” Super Sanctuary State” by expanding the” Trust Act” ( PA 19- 20 ). Assistance between state law enforcement and federal immigration officials is prohibited by this law. Democrats voted along party lines in favor of including these protections for those with felony convictions, well-known gang affiliations ( such as MS-13 ), those on terrorist watch lists, and even those who are already receiving final deportation orders despite my protracted debate with colleagues on the Senate floor. Had a decent man on Main Street think that this would benefit our nation or state?
Fast forward to 2021, when Democrats in the legislature passed the legendary” Clean Slate Law.” This law silently provides even more protection for legal illegal aliens. How? The maximum prison sentence for infractions is reduced by one day, from one month to three hundred, thanks to the new law. Why is this a change that seems subjective? Because 365 days is the level triggering registration for deportation. The repercussions are obvious. This plan provides protection for criminals who even happen to be immigrant illegally.
Additionally, progressives in the legislature have tripled the threshold for legal immigrant children to enroll in the state’s free healthcare program ( HUSKY ). First, it was for children younger than eight, then expanded to time 19, and now they are pushing to extend it to age 25.
More than reconsidering these guidelines considering the escalating federal talk, state agencies—under the path of Political leadership—are doubling down.
Residents and other lawmakers should be aware that the state’s Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection ( DESPP ) is reporting an unexpected influx of illegal immigrants throughout Connecticut in February. In January, the agency even requested municipalities to identify” Temporary Municipal Locations” ( TML) where illegal immigrants could find shelter for up to 24 hours. A” state migrant response job force” would take their needs into account and arrange companies like housing and transportation at this time. Well, the state largely asks cities to be able to provide potential busloads of unlawful immigrants.
It is obvious that this method has a sympathetic goal: to help those who are in need. I fully support that mood. But, we cannot give priority to the safety of our neighbors or the welfare of honest illegal immigrants who entered this country without intent to commit crimes.
Connecticut’s laws over the past several years have created an interesting problem for legal improper immigrants, putting residents at hazard. These procedures not only encourage criminal action but also lead to system abuse. Additionally, they marginalize legitimate asylum seekers and another immigrants who seek legal roads to the American Dream.
Provincial government leaders in Connecticut are now faced with a crucial choice. If they continue to adhere to illegal state statutes that prevent them from adhering to federal immigration law, the land’s true law,? Otherwise, you they promote the health of their residents by reestablishing assistance with national immigration authorities? Connecticut’s state legislation, which defy national power, not only contravene constitutional principles, but put American lives at risk. Cities across the country are already experiencing the implications of towns refusing to follow federal immigration laws, and Connecticut is never immune to these implications.
The health of its members is the government’s top priority. The present administration’s approach is incompatible with Connecticut residents ‘ safety and welfare.
Like any moral American, I am in favor of increasing border security to protect our citizens and ensuring a device to keep out individual criminals, drug dealers, crew members, and terrorists. Simultaneously, we must allow those we have thoroughly screened—and who wish to be contributing members of our society—to become part of and benefit our nation.
Congress needs to put petty differences and dishonest motives aside to accomplish their goals. I ask that you help me make the case that Connecticut residents have had enough of the state’s unworkable policy on illegal immigration.  ,
State Sen. Rob Sampson
—
Sampson, a Republican, lives in Wolcott and represents Wolcott, Prospect, Southington, and Waterbury in the State Senate.
