Three whistleblowers claimed that the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) failed to look into their claim that institutional mortgage lenders did not follow regulations, but the Supreme Court decided not to review the dismissal of the case.
The world’s highest judge refused to grant the petition for appellate, or assessment, in Stone v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in an anonymous purchase on April 1. No judges dissented. The judge did not explain its choice. The judges had discussed the plea at their secret meeting on March 28. At least four of the nine judges may vote in order for a petition to be moved to the dental discussion level.
Trending
- California wildfires claim 16 lives, Trump calls it ‘one of the worst catastrophes’ as destruction mounts
- Sri Lankan Navy arrests 8 Indian fishermen for alleged poaching
- Bodycam footage shows New Orleans attacker firing at police before officers shot him dead
- Hear Me Out: Yes, JD Vance SHOULD Skip the Inauguration
- 16 dead, landscapes turn hellscapes as Los Angeles battles costliest wildfire disaster in US history
- Elizabeth Warren slammed for seeking wildfire donations to Democrat platform
- Indian-Origin Anita Anand drops out of Canadian Prime Minister race, says ‘will not seek re-election’
- Baloch human rights group holds rally to honour victims of extrajudicial killings