As death rates, physical assaults, large melancholy, and anxiety grip America’s youth, the Biden administration, state legislatures, and public school districts have begun usurping science education with” transgender and gender- nonbinary” curriculum.
Pupils in over a dozen state no longer have access to medically grounded sex education, which has been replaced by liberal laws and regulations requiring schools to exchange medically verified facts with pseudo-scientific support for sex flexibility.  ,
Despite the claims of the U. S. Department of Education, no statistical studies show sex change or “gender deviance” is a good or regular part of human advancement.
These kid- targeted policy prescriptions are often sweetened deliberately by using secure terminology, for as” comprehensive“, “inclusive“, and “gender affirming” to color those who disagree with the scientific, evil content aimed at minors as racist and ruthless.  ,
News outlets ( who may claim to be impartial ) use those sexist terms in their coverage of the outrage if parents criticize the content of these postmodern sex-education revisions.
By portraying dissidents as knuckle-dragging Neanderthals, this effectively gatekeepers any discussion about negative consequences. After all, what kind of monster would n’t be inclusive and affirming?
Flagstaff Unified School District in Arizona is the most recent and flagrant instance of this. Local parents were able to get a video of school district staff discussing changes to the sex-ed curriculum, including eliminating the boy/girl binary.  ,
When parents shared their concerns at the next school board meeting, board President Christine Fredericks responded:  ,” I will never apologize for being inclusive”.
Liberals ‘ strategy of dismissing any commonsense concerns with moral scolding straight out of a 1990s anti-bullying commercial has been successful so far. Parents who expressed concern about teenage boys pretending to be girls to gain access to girls ‘ locker rooms were disregarded as backward, uninformed, and unfeeling.
When tragedy struck, in part due to these policies and worldviews—as in the sexual assault by a “gender- nonconforming” boy in a girls ‘ restroom of Virginia’s Loudoun County Public Schools—parents were scolded again and charged with being bigoted opportunists.
Similarly, after the shooting at Nashville’s Covenant School, in which a transgender assailant slaughtered three 9- year- old students and three staff members at the private Christian school, White House press secretary Karine Jean- Pierre responded by suggesting that” transphobia” was the true danger.
The Trevor Project, an LGBTQ+ activist group, has repeatedly stated that the nearly 40 % suicide rate for transgender people is not related to mental illness or harmful prescriptions. Instead, it’s the result of “bullying”, which also has been redefined to mean “anyone who does n’t passionately support the child’s transition” . ,
Federally funded media outlets like PBS have consistently and without question echoed this claim.
The Left’s main argument is that updating the sex education curriculum is crucial for them because of this quantitatively unverified accusation. After all, the purpose of sex education is to respond to questions about physiological and reproductive development in students.  ,
These responses in biology-based sex education make clear distinctions between men and women, not just in terms of external sexual organs but also in terms of development rate, hormone production, balance, and higher susceptibility to some diseases and conditions.
A postmodern, “inclusive” approach as outlined by LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, teachers unions, and massive grants from the Biden administration removes that differentiation altogether.  ,
It is haughtily distant from reality to distinguish between sex and gender as physicality and mentality, thus separating behavior from sex by suggesting that your sex comprises your organs while your gender is all in your mind. Naturally produced hormones based on sex govern anatomical systems, behavior, immune response, and reproduction.
The additional foolishness of telling minors that changing external appendages somehow confirms a gender change only adds insult to the harm done to a subject that was historically grounded in science.
Although biological sex education cautioned boys and girls about the higher risk of developing cancerous tumors in some sex-specific organs and advised them to monitor for signs at various ages, the new “gender affirming” sex ed does not provide any information to students about the carcinogenic danger of “hormonal treatments” in gender transitions.
The human endocrine system is incredibly fragile, tampering with it can be perilous. Women who undergo hormonal menopause should be informed that doing so increases their risk of developing cancer by a whopping 40 %. Although the same hormones are injected in transgender treatments, no such carcinogen warning is required or offered in any current “gender affirming” sex- ed curriculum.
The absence of patients ‘ mental health improvement, as well as the rising rates of detransition and regret are not mentioned either.
None of the books I’ve taught in biology, anatomy, and physiology, or developmental psychology have ever provided a shred of proof supporting the omission or twisting of crucial information when instructing students.  ,
At that point, you’re no longer a teacher, you’re a sleazy salesman for a pyramid scheme.
The misnamed” sex education” that the Department of Education describes as” safe and supported” is in reality temporal, shallow, and dangerous. President Joe Biden’s administration has put American children in danger via woke dictate, bastardizing health education into its antithesis, while other nations ban transgender experiments on minors.
Sex education in the United States is quickly turning into a joke, and the punchline is permanent harm to American children.
