Speaking out against the current regulations, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA ) lamented that he lacks the authority to change them at this time, and made the decision on Thursday to oppose them.
Johnson made clear he opposed the latest laws and recognizes the value of changing them, even though he avoided outright calling for a rule change that might save his hand.
Johnson posted to his official X bill,” The House law allowing a Motion to Depart from a single part has harmed this company and our House majority since the beginning of the 118th Congress,” according to Johnson. “Recently, some members have encouraged me to embrace a new guideline to increase this threshold. Although I fully understand the significance of that notion, any rule change calls for the entire House’s consent, which we do not have. We may continue to rule in accordance with the current laws. ”
The House law allowing a Action to Depart from a single participant has harmed this workplace and our House majority since the start of the 118th Congress.
Lately, many members have encouraged me to accept a new guideline to increase this threshold. Although I am aware of the value of…
— Speaker Mike Johnson ( @SpeakerJohnson ) April 18, 2024
Rep. Thomas Massie pointed out Johnson ’s misleading statement, responding to it on social media.
The Speaker attempted to alter the rules to oust the motion to veto, but he did n’t have the votes today, ” Massie wrote on X.
The Speaker had to change the rules today to remove the motion to leave, but he did n’t have the votes. https ://t. co/2qv4zvayI3
— Thomas Massie ( @RepThomasMassie ) April 18, 2024
After receiving a majority of Republicans ‘ objections, Johnson’s office was contacted by Breitbart News to inquire whether he plans to change the action to change the rules.
Republicans debated changing the law on Thursday night on the House ground. Johnson asserts that not enough Democrats are in favor of changing the rules at this time, despite the fact that a large number of establishment Republicans are unwaveringly in favor of reinstatering the Speaker Nancy Pelosi-era law that would lessen liberal opposition to Johnson’s agenda.
Why do Democrats then oppose changing a law that they had to cast a unanimous ballot against in January 2023 puzzled them? The Pelosi-era movement to abandon was restored following that vote to change the House rules package, which allows a single associate to make a motion to depart. Just a few years prior, Pelosi had raised the threshold to guard her leadership position and ensure that all of her Democrats were in line.
Given that conservatives oppose the package, Johnson may have Democrat support to advance the rule that would let the House Rules Committee to pass legislation that governs larger House operations, such as the one that governs the motion’s vacate. However, it is uncommon for the majority party to support a procedural rule introduced by the bulk party, even if the minority party supports the actual legislation, as Breitbart News has documented heavily.
According to popular speculation, Democrats may ask Johnson for concessions in exchange for a vote to pass the huge Ukraine package without Democratic support.
Liberals, by withholding support for a guidelines change they want but that would keep Johnson ’s career, can exert maximum leverage on Johnson.
When asked by Breitbart if Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY ) or anyone else in his name had spoken about the rules change, specifically why Democrats appear to be withholding support for a rules change, they did not receive a response.
Breitbart even asked if If the rule change would emerge as a negotiating bargaining chip, as well as if Speaker Johnson would commit to not packaging a motion to vacate rules change that could save his work alongside a legislative law or underlying costs, like the foreign help deal, then it would be part of negotiations with Democrats to pass the law for the foreign assistance package ( or achieve any other priority of Speaker Johnson’s ).
Johnson ’s office did not respond.
Breitbart News ‘ Capitol Hill correspondent, Bradley Jaye. Follow him on X/Twitter at @BradleyAJaye.
