A woman who works for a House Democrat told the jury that her decision would be fair and impartial in the case involving the Trump calm money situation.
Susan Necheles, a attorney for Donald Trump, questioned her about her feelings for former president Donald Trump, saying that she had no thoughts for him.
For the first time in his place, I said. I’m a authorized Democrat. But I have no thoughts about him, ” she said.
She said she was “100 percent confident ” she could keep an open mind.
Her registration as a jury was challenged by the Trump security team.
Despite previous habits that suggested then, such as a background of adverse social media posts about Trump, the case is just one of several in which potential jurors have argued they could be fair and impartial.
Half of the second pool of potential jury previously earlier earlier admitted at the beginning that they could never be fair and impartial in the case.
Alvin Bragg, the district attorney for New York, contends that Trump lied about his business records before the 2016 election by labeling an alleged “hush money” pay to adult film actress Stormy Daniels as a “legal” price rather than a promotion expense. Bragg claims this was done to cover up a national election violation.
Following Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on ”X”, Truth Social, or on Instagram.
