Scholar: Plan’ will destroy archaeological analysis’ on Native American culture
Researchers at the University of Minnesota would need to get permission from Native American organizations before conducting research on their faiths.
However, an archaeologist has issues about the plan.
Experts would also need to complete a training package before conducting studies on indigenous lands, nations, or nations, according to Karen Diver, senior advisor to the leader for the Office of Native American Affairs.
According to a Minnesota Daily review, the Faculty Senate is scheduled to take the scheme into consideration at its Thursday meet.
The College Fix two requests for comment from Diver; one concerned how the proposed policy may vary from the university’s existing plans and how it might impact scholars whose studies is not deemed permissible by a community or indigenous people.
But, Elizabeth Weiss, a professor of archaeology at San Jose State University, outlined a number of problems with the plan in a new message to The Fix.
This policy” may destroy archaeological research on African American human remains and artifacts,” Weiss said,” but it also extends to geography and geography because it covers research conducted on what are regarded as indigenous lands.”
Researchers are required to provide training in accordance with proposed coverage requirements and funding.
The proposed policy may apply to faculty, researchers, and students” who are pursuing work with Tribal partners, Tribal communities, Cultural natural resources, and another Tribally- controlled or Tribal- serving institutions, Indigenous Peoples, places, and objects of historical significance to Indigenous Peoples, wherever those Aboriginal peoples, places, and objects may be”, according to the draft.
It lists the requirements for working with nations when conducting research, including the completion of a training package on tribal-university relations related to job financing.
Additional requirements include acquiring cultural acceptance, following cultural, state, and federal regulations, building relationships with the aboriginal peoples, establishing cultural “data sovereignty”, and obtaining authorization from the Office of Native American Affairs.
Currently, university policies do not specifically address research involving Native Americans.
The Fix contacted the university’s media relations office with inquiries regarding the impact of the proposed policy change on research.
In a recent email, the university responded,” This policy was established to inform U of M research practices that respect the rights of Tribes as sovereign nations.”
The Fix also contacted Kieran McNulty, the UM Department of Anthropology chair, to inquire how the proposal might differ from the university’s current policies and how it might impact academicians whose research is against the wishes of tribes or indigenous peoples.
McNulty said the policy is still being drafted in an email earlier this month, but McNulty declined to comment. He gave The Fix a call to the university’s media relations office. The Fix emailed Chuck Tombarge, a specialist in media relations, with the questions, but they never received a response.
Anthropologist: Tribal control of research data is big concern
Weiss, the anthropologist, said the tribal control of data is just one area of concern.
Researchers wo n’t be able to publish findings that disprove tribal myths as a result of the proposed policy. The proposed policy explicitly states that:’ The most important thing to remember is that Tribes have a sovereign right to collect, store, manage, and share their data,'” Weiss said.
This is distinct from what occurs in academic research typically. Any agreement with your indigenous research partners regarding sharing and/or publication of data and findings should be reached,” she said.
Basically, the policy would give tribes control over researchers ‘ ability to ask questions, share data, and conduct and publish research, Weiss said.
” In other words, at any time along the way to completion, the tribes can kibosh your research, censor your writings, and derail your career if you do n’t obey their commands”, she told The Fix.
Weiss claimed that the proposed policy would restrict the amount of data that researchers can share and would be detrimental to the research process.
” This is different from other academic research, and it is different in a bad way,” they claim, as they claim. Numerous journals have shifted toward providing open access to data. Scientific research is at its best when data can be shared to ensure hypotheses are re- tested, conclusions are challenged, and replication can be achieved”, she said.
Weiss argued that sharing data and allowing for disagreements are essential components of scientific integrity and that they are necessary to develop the most compelling theories to address our most complex issues today.
MORE: UMinn accused of ‘ genocide,’ should pay Native American reparations: report
IMAGE: Abbie Warnock- Matthews/Shutterstock
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
