Close Menu
    Trending
    Subscribe
    Friday, June 6

    NY Times shamelessly takes covering for Biden’s fibs to an entirely new level

    Updated: US News No Comments

    The once-venerable New York Times is advancing at nosedive rate as the conventional media’s crumbling reputation drags it to the bottom.

    The outlet, which is no longer a constantly trustworthy source of truthful information and serves as the Democrat party’s unofficial propaganda arm, has recently raised the stakes for its partisanship with its most recent cover-up of Joe Biden’s lies.

    The octogenarian leader made an appearance on Howard Stern’s SiriusXM radio show on Friday, and he revealed another of his frequently-stated rumors, that he had been arrested while organizing the civil rights movement, a claim that has n’t been proven to have any real basis.

    Biden claimed to have been detained while” standing on the door with a dark home” during a time of desegregation, a hashing that had formerly been refuted by PolitiFact and the Washington Post.

    The unfortunate remains of” The Gray Lady” chose to describe it as simply good ole Joe stretching the truth rather than as the blatant falsehood that it was in order to accurately describe Biden’s lay as what it was to visitors.

    ” At another level, Mr. Biden appeared to stretch the truth about being detained as a student at a segregation rally in Delaware once more. There is no proof that he ever attended a protest for legal right,” the Times wrote.

    X users led by nationally syndicated radio network and Outkick founder Clay Travis blasted the writer’s terrible having of sides by covering for Biden’s previously rejected arrest account rather than calling it a lie.

    How was JoeBiden allegedly lying to Howard Stern about being detained at a legal rights protest, according to the New York Times? By saying Biden” appeared to once again bend the facts. ” He did n’t” stretch the truth “he lied. Why wo n’t ⁦@nytimes say Biden lied”? Travis asked.

    Other emotions are a sign of the writer’s decrease, with only its readers remaining able to trust it as a reliable information source in the era of multimedia lies.

    One person made a particularly intriguing study about the race-bait leader.

    Unfortunately, the Times even harshly criticized Biden for refusing to answer questions from impartial reporters, their reporters, while simultaneously it was running interference for him.

    Mr. Biden has conducted far fewer press events and sit-down conversations with independent editors than his essentially unelected successors. It is correct that The Times requested an on-the-record meeting with Mr. Biden, just like it has done with all leaders dating back more than a century. The papers stated that the president has a right to never discuss his views with The Times because he opposes our independent reporting, and that he will continue to be fully and fairly covered in any case.

    Chris Donaldson
    Most recent posts by Chris Donaldson ( see all )

    We have no compassion for comments containing violence, prejudice, profanity, profanity, doxing, or cruel behavior. Please visit the” image below and to the right of a comment if it appears to be spam. Thank you for working with us to keep the conversation moving.

    Source credit

    Keep Reading

    © 2025 alancmoore.com