A new accusation of poll interference was brought against the former president by the former president’s legal wars, but this one was directed at Special Counsel Jack Smith rather than Trump.
Tuesday New York Rep. Elise Stefanik, the head of the House Republican Conference, took purpose at the Justice Department appointment with a conventional morality issue. The GOP head both claimed in a letter to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility that Smith had meddled in the 2024 presidential election and that he had violated office requirements.
” Jack Smith’s many attempts to scramble to test the national January 6th case against President Trump violated lengthy- standing, obvious Justice Department policy”, stated the congresswoman’s letter. Additionally, Jack Smith repeatedly violating the United States District Court for the District of Columbia’s remain of trials is a violation of the rule of law and legal do. Smith should be subject to appropriate discipline because his steps disregarded the Justice Department and the federal government as a whole.
According to Stefanik in a post-it note on social media,” It’s obvious to any reasonable observer that Jack Smith is trying to obstruct the American people from electing Donald Trump.” He has tried every trick to get President Trump prosecuted illegally for the clear ( if unstated ) purpose of trying him before the November election.
I recently lodged a formal ethics complaint with the Office of Professional Responsibility of the Department of Justice for his deceptive vote intervention.
It’s clear to any fair spectator that Jack Smith is trying to interfere with the 2024 election … photograph. twitter.com/lNW4MUz5Oi
— Elise Stefanik ( @EliseStefanik ) April 30, 2024
The Supreme Court held a hearing on the issue of political immunity last month regarding the allegations that former president Donald Trump tried to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential vote. Regardless of whether the court returned the case to the US Court of Appeals or issued a decision on their own by the end of the current term’s June term, it was still possible that this particular case of lawfare would n’t be resolved until after the November election, despite the demand for the trial to start in March.
Stefanik criticized Smith’s try to see the same play out because she raised the volume of the case’s supporting evidence to refute her theory that the special counsel was purposefully rushing the proceedings in an effort to aid the Democrats stay in power of the White House.
There are thousands of hours of camera film, and roughly thirteen million pages of finding for President Trump to evaluate. In her letter to the DOJ, she stated that prosecutions bringing a situation of this complexity, with so many significant and fascinating legal issues to resolve, would typically not attempt to bring it to test within five months. The only argument in favor of an early test date was to work toward a test date before the November election, and Jack Smith is clearly prohibited from acting on that ground in the Justice Department Manual.
Using Smith’s own words against him that” no one in this region …is above the law”, Stefanik added,” If that is true, then he should be available to, and welcome, an ethics investigation into do that, on its mouth, implicates potential violations of DOJ scheme and many rules of skilled conduct”.
The chair argued that” Biden special counsel Jack Smith’s blatant violation of District Court orders and his highly unusual and obviously improper attempts to expedite the trial demonstrate his partisan attempt to influence the results of the 2024 presidential election.” Therefore, your office ought to launch an investigation into Biden special counsel Jack Smith’s ostensible attempt to politicize his criminal case and unlawfully interfere with the 2024 presidential election. His apparent violations of Justice Department standards and his other ethical duties should be investigated.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, click the” icon below and to the right of that comment to reply to it instead. Thank you for working with us to keep the conversation moving.