Hollywood is at odds with Hollywood as actors try to impose restrictions on artificial intelligence technology, especially when it comes to their modern likenesses, while studios are retaliating, alleging that such restrictions would violate First Amendment rights.
The growing conflict became clear during a Parliamentary reading on Tuesday when SAG-AFTRA and the Motion Picture Association members voiced opposing positions on a proposed Senate bill called the No Fakes Act, which would grant actors a “digital synthesis ideal” to permit the use of their photo, words, or physical resemblance.
Critically, the “right” may be inherited by an writer’s descendants.
On Tuesday, the ,  , Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property heard from a series of testimony on the No Fakes Act.  , In addition to staff from SAG- AFTRA and the MPA, the English rapper , FKA leaves was likewise present to give her perspective on AI.
The review bill was exceedingly large, according to the MPA, which is the Congressional lobbying body that represents the largest studios and streamers, and it would hurt Hollywood’s creativity.
According to a Deadline report, MPA senior vice president Ben Sheffner warned that “legislating in this area involves doing something that the First Amendment quickly limits: Regulating the material of speech.”
To achieve the bill’s objectives without unintentionally chilling or even outlawing genuine, constitutionally protected uses of technology to improve storytelling, it will take very careful drafting.
Sheffner apparently made references to the film Forrest Gump for the moments where former presidents are online altered at one point.
” To be clear: Those representations did not require the acceptance of their kin”, Sheffner said. And enforcing such a demand would essentially enshrine representations that would be infringe on the First Amendment for heirs or their business successors.
SAG- AFTRA ‘s , Duncan Crabtree- Ireland voiced help for the document costs.
It’s an economic right, so it’s surprising that anyone would believe that this right does n’t merit preservation and protection after death. It’s a private straight. And it’s something that has true price”, he apparently said.
AI was a major source of contention during the stars ‘ attack last year, which brought most of Hollywood to a historic end for several weeks, with many TV and film productions being forced to halt engagement at huge costs to the producers.
When the dust settled, SAG-AFTRA claimed to have accomplished significant success in standing up for its actors against AI encroachment. However, some people still wonder how significant those victories were, saying that they fall short of actual protections, giving studios more room to work on them.
The studios are n’t giving in to their zeal for AI, as evidenced by Tuesday’s hearing, which revealed how far apart the two sides are on the subjet.
A rumored victory was also trumpeted by The Writers Guild of America. Students are required to now disclose any AI-generated content that has been provided to writers. In addition, studios ca n’t force writers to use AI, nor can AI receive credit on a TV show or movie.
But again, ambiguities abound. Some writers are already using AI tools like ChatGPT as a tool in their creative process. And studios are anticipated to look for legal hiccups to make the most of the technology.
Follow David Ng on Twitter , @ HeyItsDavidNg. Have a tip? Contact me at , [email protected]
