In response to accusations that they discriminate against lawyers with” Afro-Caribbean hair,” courts in England are reportedly considering removing the requirement for lawyers to wear traditional hair.
The Telegraph reports that demands have been made to remove the requirement for barristers to wear wigs in front of the jury because they are” culturally insensitive,” making the classic way of dress in American courtrooms to be wokism’s most recent scalp.
Following an incident in 2022 when a black attorney with a huge african style, Michael Etienne, a man who had a hair, claimed he would face being in contempt of court if he refused to wear it while claiming that the need represented a form of “hair discrimination,” which dates back to at least 1685.
While hair are also required in the crown judge, the Court of Appeal, and the High Court, the condition was ended in 2007 for community, civil and Supreme Court circumstances in 2007.
Mixed-race attorney Rachel Bale argued in favor of completely removing the tradition, saying that wearing wigs for people with some black hairstyles is” not healthy for objective.”
Your scalp is thus strangely important and is fully woven with your identity, she claimed, something that is overlooked frequently in black culture.
Leslie Thomas Houston, a prominent attorney who is also of African heritage, has described the wigs as a “ridiculous outfit” that allegedly depicts the” culturally insensitive weather” in the American judicial system.
” The hair definitely ought to be removed. There is n’t any place in a modern society for lawyers to be wearing 17th- era style”, he said this week, adding that another “archaic” dress code products should also be scrapped, including songs, collarettes, and wing collar.
The Bar Council established a working group to consider court attire in the context of all protected characteristics, according to a spokesman for the Bar Council.
As part of our regular dialogue on equality and diversity issues, the findings of the working group are currently being discussed with the judiciary.
