Republicans are being encouraged by President Donald Trump’s plan to talk about how the Democratic Party’s pro-immigration procedures and the low wages they cause are seriously hurting Americans ‘ pockets.
A Washington Post article that detailed the nationalist attack on movement and how it might be compared to Biden’s high-migration and low-wage monetary policy was buried deep in the article:
In a statement, the Trump campaign said President , Biden is “flooding America’s labor pool with millions of reduced- wage improper migrants who are immediately attacking the wages and opportunities of difficult- working Americans”. According to Spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt, Biden’s policy of issuing immigrants work permits while their demands for legal citizenship are pending “is particularly devastating to African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and union employees who are forced to watch their work and people resources be stolen by people Joe Biden should never have allowed into our land.”
The statement opens the door to a lot of Republican candidates and strategy committees, who want to appeal to the many bounce voters who prefer to dismiss the chaos and illegal immigration.
Thus far, nearly all GOP candidates have avoided those nationalist pitches , amid business support for the continuing inflow of taxpayer- aided consumers, apartment- sharing renters, and wage- cutting workers.
The Washington Post‘s pro-immigration article relied heavily on academic debates to counteract the Trump campaign’s dollars and cents response, which did not readily acknowledge the obvious pocketbook impact of Biden’s cheap labor policy. The Post article began:
As Donald Trump touts increasingly aggressive plans to crack down on illegal immigration, economists are wary that his proposals would deal a massive blow to the U. S. job market, which has  , stayed strong , thanks in part to foreign- born workers.
The Post article then veered into a professor-versus-professor dispute that revealed Biden’s painful pocketbook realities:
Some academic , research , does show that a rise in immigration drags down wages and job opportunities for all workers. For example, Harvard economist George Borjas has  , found , that a 10 percent increase in the number of immigrants within a particular group probably lowers that group’s wage , by 3 to 4 percent, which can particularly affect workers with lower levels of education. But his work , also found , that lower wages can bring higher profits for an employer, with those added gains ultimately growing the economy for native workers.
According to Michael Clemens, an economist at George Mason University with a focus on international migration, a migrant who worked in a restaurant complements an American citizen who was” serving a table” and relied on one for their job.
Nevertheless, some reporters at other media outlets are blatantly exposing the damage. For example, the Wall Street Journal reported on May 17:” Adjusted for inflation, net worth was up just 0.7 % through Biden’s first three years, compared with 16 % through Trump’s first three years”.
Wall Street Journal of household net worth ( wsj.com )
Other reporters describe migration’s massive economic and civic damage to the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia.
However, the most reporters ooh the brutal economic exploitation that the federal government’s immigration policies have enabled. The Financial Times, for example, reported from New York on May 21:
After traveling through the jungle for almost two months from Ecuador to New York with her husband and daughter, Silvana immediately began looking for work.
…
Silvana now earns$ 60 per day working four hours a day by selling plates of rice and soup from a white cooler outside the shelter where she lives.
Silvana’s wage adds up to$ 300 per week, or$ 15, 000 per year, ensuring her complete reliance on welfare and aid from the state’s taxpayers. Her willingness to work for a pittance also drags down the wages earned by other illegals, migrants, and American citizens, thus expanding the demand for welfare and aid programs.
But the Financial Times prefers to focus on the concerns and desires of employers, contending,” New York’s hospitality industry’ absolutely still needs labour,’ said Andrew Rigie, executive director of the NYC Hospitality Alliance, a trade group for the city’s restaurants and bars”.
Extraction Migration
Since at least 1990, the federal government has relied on , Extraction Migration , to grow the consumer economy after it helped investors move the high- wage manufacturing sector to lower- wage countries.
The migration policy extracts , vast amounts of , human resources from needy countries. The additional workers, consumers, and renters push up stock values , by shrinking Americans ‘ wages, subsidizing , low- productivity companies, boosting rents, and spiking real estate prices.
The economic policy has pushed many native- born Americans out of careers in a , wide variety , of business sectors, reduced Americans ‘ , productivity , and political , clout, slowed , high- tech innovation, shrunk trade,  , crippled , civic solidarity, and incentivized government officials and progressives to ignore the , rising death rate , of , discarded, low- status , Americans.
The policy also sucks jobs and wealth from heartland states by , subsidizing coastal investors , and government agencies with a flood of low- wage workers, high- occupancy renters, and government- aided consumers. Similar policies have harmed the economies and citizens of Canada and the UK.
The colonialism- like policy , has damaged small nations , and has killed , hundreds of Americans , and , thousands of migrants, including many on the , taxpayer- funded jungle trail , through the Darien Gap in Panama.
