It’s no incident that The Wall Street Journal ran an “exclusive” biographical part on Merrick Garland’s” by- the- book, enjoy- no- favorites approach” the day the attorney general is set to be grilled by Congress. The management wants to portray the AG as a justice-giving person.
In reality, Garland has frequently used force against the government’s political foes, from pro-life activists to concerned families to presidential candidates, while sometimes putting the Biden presidency in an uneasy social status when faced with no actual options.
Despite a parliamentary lawsuit, Garland is still refusing to provide audio recordings of Joe Biden’s conversations with former Special Counsel Robert Hur. Even as the DOJ stonewalls Congress, it is prosecuting the Republican Party’s political candidate for crimes for which the Hur audio presumably “exonerates” Biden.
Garland’s says of professional privilege are facile. Any president’s audio can be made available to the public if Biden’s sound can be withheld from the community just because someone could use AI to change the tape.
Moreover, why is this DOJ’s problem? There is no justification for withholding the voice now that the Hur record has already been made public, which is in line with Biden’s lying. The transcript, which the DOJ purportedly cleaned up all the “uhs,” “ohs,” and garbled words in, would possible strengthen the president’s status as an “elderly guy with a bad memory.”
So, the real problem here is n’t the deep fake, it’s the unedited tape. It is obvious that keeping the voice is politically motivated. Which is predictable, since Garland has been one of the most republican AGs in storage.
Garland was letting the statute of limitations on the government’s family’s alleged foreign influence work out while he was robbing the former president’s home over a defined record dispute.
Garland was also fearmongering about the upcoming MAGA radical trend, inflating the danger with fabricated statistics, while left-wing pro-Hamas protesters were rioting and threatening Jews.
Even after an assassin attempted to kill Brett Kavanaugh, the DOJ was using armed teams to raid the homes of pro-life families and prosecute elderly anti-abortion protesters for praying in front of” clinics” while Garland did nothing about those ( likely ) illegally picketing the homes of federal judges and attempting to intimidate them and influence cases.
The DOJ has been working to thwart the democratic rights of citizens in red state like Texas yet as Democrats are yammering about saving politics. Abortion is not a ( pretend ) constitutional right anymore. The DOJ does not care.
Elon Musk, the DOJ’s X operator, has opened his system to more natural conversation, and the DOJ is relaunching censorship work under the pretext of stopping foreign meddling. It’s quite the chance, right?
Garland established a “task pressure” to investigate native parents who were protesting racist curriculum and autocratic Covid restrictions, and he also resisted dissolution, despite receiving an apology from the National School Boards Association for the letter that inspired it.
Of course, the Biden administration was the one who inspired the group to use the word “domestic violence” to give the DOJ a reason to getting involved in the first place. Garland did not provide any specific threats of violence or provide any explanations for the rise in abuse and threats, according to The New York Times. The sole motivation to acquire involved was to scare kids and stifle speech.
No problem.
Perhaps the case against Hunter Biden, used most often by the left to hurl Garland’s reported Doric qualifications, is a comedy.
Let’s not ignore if the Justice Department had its way, the situation may have disappeared. Garland first appointed a state attorney, who ignored the law. David Weiss, whose office was filled with Trump allies, was prepared to give Hunter an incredible immunity deal, not only on felony gun and tax charges, but for a slew of related significant potential offenses, including failure to register as a foreign agent, bribery, and corruption.
Weiss was forced to ask Hunter to turn down two misdemeanor counts only because of Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler’s whistleblower testimony. Additionally, Judge Maryellen Noreika, who noted there was not a single precedent in which immunity was offered for” crimes in a different case,” rejected the immunity deal.
In his remarks to Congress today, Garland promised that he” will not back down from defending our democracy”, despite the “repeated attacks” and” conspiracy theor]ies ]” regarding the DOJ. Some conspiracy theories exist, no doubt, but most criticisms of Garland’s work are legitimate. It is backward to criticize his corrupt administration as an attack on the” judicial process itself.”  , Demanding no one question the actions of state institutions is authoritarian. If the system were working properly, Garland would be impeached.
Democrats have, however, justified using the state to punish and defame political foes in their efforts to save the term “democracy,” which has lost all meaning. For many progressives, the legal system is n’t merely a tool for criminal justice but a way to exact political justice.
One of the leaders in this conflict is Garland. It makes little difference whether it’s because he is a weak man who will do what is expected of him or because he is corrupt.  ,
