
Joe Biden is questioned by a fresh Time magazine interviewer about whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is extending the Israeli occupation of Hamas for political motives. ” There is every cause for people to draw that summary”, the president contends.
Boy, I would love to hear the voice of this discussion, because even the “lightly edited” text has the leader struggling to scrape together clear ideas. Biden’s whole response is as follows:
I’m not going to post on that. There is every justification for individuals to come to that conclusion. And I may identify Tha as having wanted to change the court before the war started due to the criticism he was receiving from the Israeli government. And so it’s an inner local debate that seems to have no result. And whether he would change his position or no, it’s hard to say, but it has not been good.
Or, in other words, Biden is blaming Netanyahu for prolonging a war that he wo n’t let Israel finish. Hamas would have been effectively gone if it were n’t for the administration.
Does Biden certainly understand that he “warned” Netanyahu about any major Rafah offensive that would have successfully destroyed the Hamas troops that were still enshrined behind human weapons next month? In a statement, Biden claimed that the United States would stop providing Israel with rude and efficiency weapons if Israel invaded the town. For the first time in history, a president has attempted to stop an alliance from destroying a criminal organization. And not just any despair organization, but one that murdered, biologically tortured, kidnapped — and probably still holds — American citizens.
Does Trump understand that he instructed Netanyahu to “warn” him against attacking Rafah by sending Secretary of State Antony Blinken? How about National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, who likewise “warned” Israel against an conquest of Rafah? Does he not recognize top Middle East professional, Vice President Kamala Harris, insisting that Israel’s conquest of Rafah was “huge error” and notice that there would be” outcomes”?
If this is the common stress, you can imagine what was going on in secret. Israel allegedly had no strategy to protect citizens, according to Biden. Consequently, Israel came up with one and sent it to Biden. As everyone who paid attention predicted, it soon allowed supplies to enter Gaza. Then, in an effort to extract and destroy the terrorist organization, Israel began removing civilians from the area. That still was n’t enough.
Hamas and Israel are now being treated morally equal and engaged in legitimate property disputes, making “ceasefire” agreements that would enable the force that started the war to succeed and resurrect. It seems absurd to me to think that these eliminationist theocrats will stick to harmony agreements. The leader is reportedly negotiating a deal that would require the IDF to leave Gaza while the events try to rescue the civilians who were tortured and kidnapped by Hamas.
Hamas keeps rejecting these attempts, by the way, and the leader keeps blaming Netanyahu. According to State Department spokesman Matthew Miller,” Unlimited conflict in Gaza in pursuit of some concept of total success is not going to make Israel safer.” This leadership is full of dishonest individuals.
Obama was much more interested in removing the Israeli prime minister than he was in erasing Hamas or stifling Iran. Biden is also much more interested in erasing Iran. Chuck Schumer, a well-known jew, may recall him calling for fresh elections in a foreign democracy in a manner that would smack of Biden’s dirty job. Like many things Liberals do these times, it was extraordinary. Democrats have much business trying to impose rule over other nations, despite the grousing about foreign interference in American politics. Well, some locations. Never Iran. Israel.
It’s also interesting that Biden unintentionally asserts that Netanyahu is prolonging the war because he was a part of a debate over the” constitu,” which is the system’s main issue. The judge acts formally and without any legally binding rules, and there is no real separation of powers. That was the conversation. Free societies frequently engage in contested conversations.
There is no major party or coalition in the Israeli State that you manage to kowtow to Hamas and Iran, which poses a challenge for Biden. There is a unity state. The criticism party’s head is a member of the Israeli War Council. Israelis view this as a time of success as Hezbollah missiles launch mass fires in the northern and Iran fires its missiles from the south. There is a procedure that enables Israeli citizens to initiate a fresh election at any time if they change their minds.
But what’s most galling about Biden’s comment is that he does n’t want Netanyahu to finish the war. In order to neutralize the pro-Hamas party in his party in the run-up to the 2024 election, he wants Israel to ending hostilities without achieving its objective.