Democrats have spent the past four decades working hard to double down on those attempts while employing an entirely new set of techniques to rig the 2024 election. The issues that plagued the 2020 election have n’t gone away. Republicans wo n’t succeed until they comprehend the dangers that lie ahead as a whole new rigging strategy is used, not the least of which is the Democrats ‘ campaign against imprisoning their political rival.
The” Zuckbucks” schemes of 2020 pale in comparison to Biden’s mobilization of the federal government to drive voter turnout in ways that help Democrats. Liberals have topped the Russia-collusion hoax by attempting to put their most senior political opposition in jail, which is just as bad for the country as it was for the country.
The 2024 vote is being rigged to ensure that Trump don’t work or, if he does run, cannot win, as my partner John Daniel Davidson once said:” Much like the 2020 poll, which was rigged months in advance of Joe Biden’s victory, was it manipulated?
What’s New?
Democrats are trying to put their most important social rival in jail in a move that may establish this new American era.
A Manhattan district attorney funded by Figure prepared allegations that no one could properly state before presenting them to a judge chosen from a pool that chose Trump to win the election in 2020. The show trial against Trump, which was nothing more than an expansion of Democrats ‘ 2016 election for, was then headed by a Biden benefactor.
[READ Future: Trump Verdict Is Indictment Of GOP Leaders Who Can’t Be Bothered To Avoid Republic-Wrecking Lawfare]
At this point, we ca n’t assume the left- wing judge wo n’t sentence Trump to actual jail time. Trump also has a chance to win a trial in three different criminal law cases by November, including one in which Biden’s DOJ authorized an extraordinary raid on Mar-a-Lago where agents were permitted to use deadly force to discover documents that government prosecutors later admitted they tampered with.
The purpose of these studies is at least double. First of all, they are designed to drain Trump’s sources and hinder his ability to plan and socialize with voters. Second, the tests are intended to assassinate him and make him appear less appealing than Biden, whom many voters have resent. This is demonstrated by Democrats ‘ immediate use of the term” convicted felon” to describe the former president.
Liberals attempted to oust Trump from the White House by simply removing him from the ballot under the guise of an obscure constitutional principle that the Supreme Court rejected with overwhelming support.
And if law enforcement ca n’t stop Trump in time for Nov. 5, Republicans will have a shot at it if they use the federal agency’s arsenal to target Democrat-leaning voters.
Biden signed Executive Order 14019, which basically orders national authorities to ingrain taxpayer funds on election interference. The Department of Education ( DOE), for instance, is one organization where this is being carried out. Federal Work-Study funding was announced in a letter from the DOE in February that could now be used to hire students to work as poll workers or enroll voters for government offices. Students in school and recent alumni are mathematically much more likely to become Democrats.
In addition to the DOJ’s position in the Trump-era election, Biden’s Attorney General Merrick Garland has stated that the office will issue state laws governing mail-in balloting and the use of fall boxes.
However, even individual states are taking measures to rig the election in Democrats ‘ pursuit. Pennsylvania, for example, has partnered with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ( CISA )— which has been described as the “nerve center” of government censorship — to target speech it deems a” threat” ahead of the election. In Nevada, a law passed in 2021 that strongly resembled a measure that extended the mail-in vote date for the 2020 election. The new laws has been challenged by democrats.
What acted Progressives in the 2020 Election?
As Democrats ramp up efforts to rig the 2024 election, many of the techniques deployed in 2020 have n’t disappeared. The 2020 election was hampered by both improper election laws and flat-out disregard for those rules.
Consider Wisconsin for instance, where Trump lost by roughly 20, 000 seats, and where appointed authorities expanded the use of poll drop boxes during the 2020 election. The state Supreme Court ruled those officials lacked the authority to seize the government when it issued advice permitting the rise in direct opposition to state rules two years after the election. Milwaukee and other left-leaning cities had more than a few of these prohibited vote boxes. Biden beat Trump by more than 100, 000 vote in Milwaukee only.
In Pennsylvania, election officials unjustly permitted the counting of ballots that either had a lost date or had incorrect markings. ” Tons” of such votes were received in both the 2020 presidential election as well as the 2022 midterms, according to a decision from the 3rd U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. In 2020, many of these votes were counted.
However, the election laws that were manipulated overtly was n’t the only factor in how the outcome of 2020 turned out. Big Tech even contributed, mainly as a result of its decision to censor the Hunter Biden laptop history and other damaging stories. The New York Post initially broke the laptop story month before the election, prompting Facebook, Twitter, and other websites to throttle people ‘ ability to share the account that had been fraudulently tagged as “disinformation“. Meanwhile, corporate media outlets like NPR flatly refused to cover the story.
The FBI worked with Big Tech to cast even the most skeptical doubt on the laptop’s legitimacy even though it was known about its authenticity in 2019. Federal authorities have warned Facebook to “be on high alert” due to a potential “dump” of” Russian propaganda,” according to Metaa CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s podcast host Joe Rogan. Zuckerberg said Facebook then approached the laptop story as “potentially misinformation, important misinformation” and subdued its reach.
But Zuckerberg’s impact on the 2020 election extends far past his tech platform’s censorship of factual information. More than$ 400 million was dumped by Zuckerberg and his wife into the 2020 election, which left-wing nonprofits used to disproportionately target blue areas of battleground states, under the auspices of so-called” safe election” grants. According to my colleague M. D. Kittle, “in many cases the grant program was a privately funded get-out-the-vote campaign to drive swing-state Democrat voters.”
At least 28 states — mostly red states but including swing states like Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania — have banned such private cash infusions from infiltrating their elections. But even without” Zuckbucks”, other Democrat- aligned groups, like the U. S. Alliance for Election Excellence, are working to interfere in local election administration. The Alliance and the Center for Tech and Civic Life are currently collaborating on these efforts. In 2020, the Alliance and the Center for Tech and Civic Life teamed up with Zuckerberg to change the local election system.
According to my colleague Shawn Fleetwood, “existing Zuckbucks bans would n’t necessarily prevent local election departments from contracting with the Alliance,” to get legal or political consulting or guidance on recruitment and training.
The majority of the strategies used in 2020 are still in use, or even newer ones. However, they are now joined by blatant lawmaking and the creation of federal agencies to support Biden’s election campaign.
Brianna Lyman is a correspondent for The Federalist on elections.
