Less than 20 % of President Joe Biden’s supporters think society would be better off putting marriage and children first, according to a new document from the Pew Research Center, which was released last year. These voters are also the ones who are most likely to think that” climate change” poses an immediate existential threat to the species ‘ future, which raises the question of who are Biden supporters saving the planet for if only a small percentage of them even want children.
Democrats largely believe in climate change as a “major threat,” according to a separate document from the Pew Research Center released last summer, with 78 percent of Republicans believing but, compared to only 23 percent of Republicans. Democrats were also found to be in favour of pricey solutions to the issue, with 59 % citing climate change as their top priority.
At the same time, Liberals are more than twice as likely as Republicans to identify climate change as a “major purpose” to remain single, according to a 2020 study by the Morning Consult. Compared to just 16 % of Republicans who said the same, more than 32 % of Democrats identified climate change as at least a minor cause of non-parenthood.
According to data from the Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ), the birthrate in America dropped to a record low in 2023. Investors were warned by a Morgan Stanley research three years ago that the “movement to avoid having children is growing and having an impact on fertility rates more quickly than any prior trend in the field of fertility decline”
Some much- left climate activists, like as Biden’s Bureau of Land Management ( BLM) Director Tracy Stone- Holding, have cautioned that children are an economic problem who threaten to destroy the planet’s resources. Contrary to the frequent depictions of a “world on fireplace”, however, the world can and will maintain future generations. In his 2020 publication, Apocalypse Never, Michael Shellenberger pointed out that many of the mid-20th century’s predictions of a global economic catastrophe caused by overcrowding never materialized.
” Danish economist Ester Boserup, working for the]Food and Agriculture Organization ( FAO )], did historical research finding that as the human population increased, people had long found ways to increase food production”, Shellenberger wrote. Practitioners were aware that the number of people added each year to the world population had reached its highest point in 1987.
Despite quick innovation and reliable energy, such as fossil fuels, the weather on Earth is currently the safest it’s always been.
Weather- related deaths have dropped more than , 98 percent , since 1900. Weather has been to responsible for 0.07 percentage of deaths worldwide and , 0.01 percent , of deaths in the United States between 1980 and 2014. The world warmed 1 level Celsius since the Little Ice Age era of the 1800s despite significantly higher atmospheric pollution than it had previously existed.
Hurricanes , and , wildfires , are also on the collapse, pushing down the cost of weather- related catastrophe as a reveal of GDP.
President Biden, however, has made fighting” weather change” to save the planet a cornerstone of his White House plan, with tens of billions spent to support socially dangerous solar energy products. But if his own supporters do n’t plan to procreate, for whom is the Earth even worth allegedly” saving”?
