In a move suggestive of her social leader, incoming Mexican leader Claudia Sheinbaum displayed a number of studies that, according to her political party, show a large majority of people support questionable administrative changes on Monday.
Sheinbaum said the studies were only “informational”. She claimed that the poll took place over the weekend and included face-to-face interviews with thousands of qualified voters from across Mexico.
People should do” their personal analysis of the results”, she said.
The polls, which are unconstitutional in any way, are a rip-off of Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, her political leader, who did take Sheinbaum’s place on October 1st, are a handbook.
Critics have questioned the effectiveness of the studies, saying they are more of a publicity stunt to help generate more interest in passing legislation.
Six years ago, Lopez Obrador made one of his own campaign promises by submitting a largely constructed$ 13 billion airport project to a nationwide consultation before his election and election as president. That study also had his back, and he abruptly canceled the project when he assumed office.
In another study, respondents largely supported his animal project, the Maya Train, which then carries visitors around the Yucatan Peninsula.
Voter turnout for a national referendum on whether former presidents should be tried for wrongdoing was so low that it did n’t match the required threshold for binding prosecution.
After his Morena party clinched a two-thirds majority in the Congress in the June 2 votes, Lopez Obrador has stated he will work on 20 constitutional amendments. They include putting all judges on election ballots and putting a number of expensive benefit mandates in Mexico’s constitution in place.
The country’s court has blocked many of Lopez Obrador’s earlier reforms, ruling them illegal.
Sheinbaum’s studies were conducted through personal Mexican experts Enkoll and De Las Heras Demotecnia, in addition to her group’s unique percentage of studies. She claimed that Morena’s use of various methodologies, which gave them complete freedom to conduct surveys throughout the nation, was uninterfering.
Each ballot was based on between 1, 000 and 1, 500 encounter- to- experience interviews conducted between June 14 and 16. They had plus or minus three percentage point profitability.
Respondents ‘ issues included whether they were aware that the party was proposing criminal shifts and whether they thought the judicial system was corrupt.
Nearly nine out of ten respondents, according to Morena, want the design of an impartial body that do research and hold accountable magistrates in any work of corruption.
The US has expressed concern about Mexican judicial adjustments.
Last year, Brian Nichols, US assistant secretary of state for Northern Hemisphere affairs, urged that there be accountability in Mexico’s judicial reform, especially concerning any influence the shifts could have on US investors and firms. The US embassy to Mexico, Ken Salazar, said last week that a powerful criminal method was important, but it was off to Mexican to decide on the changes.
