Legitimate challengers are putting together their bids to challenge President Joe Biden over a controversial executive order that they believe did basically give asylum to around 500, 000 people living in the United States illegally.
On Tuesday, Biden made executive orders directing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( DHS) to stop deporting people who have been residing illegally in the country if they are married to a U.S. citizen.
U.S. people have generally been allowed to wed non-citizens, with the non-citizen finally being able to apply for what is known as a wedding green cards, but they have had to rush outside the country to have that green card approved. Biden’s new executive actions include a so-called “parole- in- place” approach, which allows non-citizen spouses who enter the country improperly to just remain in the country while their green cards are being processed.  ,
The deportation defense also applies to children who are illegal immigrants and have parents who are married to Americans.
Candidates for Biden’s new executive actions must be citizens of the United States for at least 10 times and have been lawfully married to Americans.  ,
In the current executive order, someone who has been living illegally in the United States might now theoretically find a willing U.S. citizen to marry them so they wo n’t have to travel abroad while they wait for approval on a marriage green card.
A second aspect of Biden’s executive order is that immigration authorities will make it easier for them to grant work visas to deferred action for children immigrants ( DACA ) recipients who are themselves the children of illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children if they have received a degree from an approved U.S. institution of higher education and have a job offer from an employer in the country.
Then, legal experts are questioning the constitutionality of Biden’s movements.
READ MORE: FBI warns of criminal challenges amid US- Mexico border crisis
The Immigration and Nationality Act ( INA ), which is currently in effect, requires “anyone who seeks a green card to enter the United States lawfully and maintain lawful status until a green card is granted,” according to Matt O’Brien, director of investigations for the Immigration Reform Law Institute ( IRLI ) and former immigration judge.
O’Brien claimed that Biden’s new administrative actions “nothing but an attempt to create an amnesty by misuse of the offense authority.”
Thomas Homan, an ICE director who previously served as acting acting director for the United States, claimed that Biden’s novel executive actions add another “enticement” to the country’s immigration and customs protection. Homan said the expansion of this “parole- in- place” method will also encourage illegal immigrants to enter the country, “hide out,” and wait for a similar asylum moment using “parole- in- place,” even though some unlawful immigrants may not be able to find a way to remain in the country through this most recent action.
AFL, a conservative legal advocacy group led by former Trump White House aide Stephen Miller, has already filed a lawsuit to prevent Biden’s new senior behavior on immigration.
The Biden Administration’s most recent motion is a slap in the face to refugees who enter the country lawfully, according to AFL on Tuesday.
Miller claimed that Biden’s actions, in addition to lowering the number of DACA recipients who are granted job visa, increase the risk of abuse for those DACA consumers.
” When granted green cards, laborers will have access to state benefits. When granted citizenship — in as soon as five years — illegals will have complete access to happiness, entitlements, the election hall, and network migration, meaning complete illegal alien extended family networks and be made into total voting citizens”, Miller said. This is an enormous asylum and a loud assault on American politics in the form of an imperial edict, the author says.
