A resolution prohibiting cell phones on campus for the entire day, including lunch and breaks between classes was passed by the Los Angeles Unified School District ( LAUSD ).
After the table is review legal issues, the ban will take effect in January 2025.  ,
Advertisement
” Our kids are glued to their phones, not unlike people”, said table part Nick Melvoin. ” They’re stealthily scrolling in class, in class time, or have their mind in their arms, walking down the hallways. Because they have their AirPods in, they are n’t talking to one another or playing at lunch or recess.
The solution passed 5- 2. According to the Los Angeles Times, the two dissident voices expressed concern about the” sum of the restrictions” and the lack of “distinction between academic time and noninstructional day.”
The region is considering suing social media companies in addition to the mobile phone restrictions.
” Now is the time. We are aware of the effects that these social media platforms are having on our kids, according to LAUSD Superintendent Alberto Carvalho. ” If we’re going to adopt a good policy regarding phone usage, we need to take a strong step and a set of actions specific to the impact that the programs that run on these devices, whether they are used in colleges or never, are having on our youth,” said one person.
” The research is clear: common usage of smartphones and social media by kids and adolescents is detrimental to their mental heath, distracts from learning, and stifles important in- people interaction”, says Melvoin, the deal’s sponsor.  ,
Advertisement
Generation Z kids “are suffering from anxiety, depression, self-harm, and related disorders at levels higher than any other generation for which we have data,” according to Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist who has been raising the alarm about excessive smartphone use by children.
The issue is not whether Haidt and others who are very concerned about the effects of too much time spent on social media sites on pre-teens and teens are correct or incorrect. The question is, can a ban really be enforced?
By all accounts, the research shows that social media algorithms are extremely addictive. Try abusing a teen addict or another addictive drug while taking crack. They will make every effort to get their “fix.”
As a teacher, Melvoin claimed to have noticed students getting distracted by their devices and skipping socializing and playing. His proposal would require the superintendent to come up with a strategy.
” We want everyone to talk about how best to do this, but we also want them to understand that this district’s goal is to prevent cell use at the school during the day, and I support it wholeheartedly,” said LAUSD Board Member Jackie Goldberg.  ,
Other areas have already put in place no cell phone policies.
Advertisement
” Some use cell phone lockers. So when a student enters the classroom, they simply check their phone in a locker before leaving,” Melvoin said. Some people may be familiar with these pouches from comedy shows or concerts, but others do so.
Banning smartphones is all the rage in government. Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, has taken his position by backing a bill that would outlaw cell phones on the statewide. Additionally, Vivek Murthy, the surgeon general of the United States, wrote an op-ed in the New York Times urging Congress to slap a warning label on social media sites.
There’s no doubt that social media sites can be addictive. But does the answer actually remove the kids ‘ phones? There must be a role for parents somewhere in that equation. When social media companies are to blame for too much of the blame, some of the responsibility falls on the parents.
