According to anonymous sources, two federal courts reportedly urged judge Aileen Cannon in the Southern District of Florida to turn over the high-profile case involving former president Donald Trump’s defined files to a colleague next year.
The post, along with a number of other ostensibly vile attacks by the click on the Columbian-born American for “pro-Trump decisions,” was quickly published just a few days after a federal appeals court rejected Democrats ‘ “orchestrated” attempt to obtain Cannon recused from the case.
Because Trump appointed her, Cannon is unable to impartially control this special event, according to media outlets like the Times. Never mind that Democrat-appointed courts have frequently ruled political situations, but they have largely escaped investigation for decades.
It is absurd to assume that Trump had the foresight to know when he hired Cannon that he would devote days of his precious campaign period in her court over a manufactured classified file incident that his political opposition managed to escape. Business media has made a concerted effort to discredit Cannon and her dedication to overseeing the Trump case with democratic caution.
Every choice Cannon made in the case involving the categorized documents has remained within her purview. In reality, many of the court’s decisions have been used to stop President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice and Special Counsel Jack Smith from acrimonizing rights and due process.
A Deliberate Double Standard
The Times claimed that Cannon had “unusual lieu” toward Mr. Trump by intervening in a way that helped him with the judicial investigation that led to his arrest. After the DOJ admitted tampering with information during the FBI’s August 2022 attack on Mar a Lago, the alleged involvement Cannon committed was eternally postponing the Trump test.
It is neither a murder nor a conflict to demand an independent evaluation of the files that Smith claimed Trump had illegally kept. Instead, giving the accused due process, unsealing documents key to understanding the DOJ’s targeting of Trump, and allowing Trump’s lawyers to challenge Smith’s appointment as illegal were all regular decisions that, if made in any other case, do not increase eyebrows.
The Times, a fierce ally of the Biden regime, however, took issue with these basic actions because Cannon’s decisions have derailed the administration’s attempt to get Trump as many convictions and as much jail time as possible before voting for the 2024 presidential election begins.
The corrupt press greeted Judge Arthur Engoron as he smirked at Trump in his New York courtroom at the start of Letitia James ‘ weak case against the Republican president. When Cannon shut down a DOJ prosecutor who later admitted that he was acting unprofessionally, however, she was scrutinized.
Cannon took an oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me… under the Constitution and laws of the United States” like every other U.S. judge.
In one of the numerous cases involving Trump, she presided over the jury, but she has not broken that oath. Cannon has, in contrast, gone to great lengths to defend the constitutional rights that Trump and his defense team were denied by courts run by partisan judges.
According to the corrupt press, Cannon is n’t conspiring with Trump to win him a few small court victories. She’s only doing what she can to uphold the Constitution, something that the judges in charge of other lawfare cases would find interesting to try.
The Federalist staff writer and host of The Federalist Radio Hour, Jordan Boyd. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire, Fox News, and RealClearPolitics. Jordanian received her bachelor’s degree from Baylor University, where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on X @jordanboydtx.
