In Wisconsin, where the far-left judge overruled state election law and made it possible for voters with disabilities to get absentee ballots online, the party’s lawmakers are contesting the ruling.  ,
The Democratic-led Department of Justice in Wisconsin also has concerns about the order, which asserts that the electrical ballot distribution to some disabled voters poses significant security and logistical challenges.  ,
Ironically, the legitimately criminal order was issued by Judge Everett Mitchell, who took heat years earlier for asserting at a public forum that individuals who steal from large- box stores should n’t be prosecuted.  ,
Tens of Thousands of Citizens
Last year, majority Republicans in the government filed a notice of charm with the 2nd District of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, asking for a stop to Mitchell’s order’s execution.  ,
In a complaint filed by eligible voters with print-reading disability who require help, Mitchell argued late last month that recent state law requires qualified voters with disabilities to abandon their right to a secret ballot.  ,
The petition contends that Wisconsin is now breaking with “myriad accommodations and similar- entry requirements under state and federal law” to ensure that voters with disabilities receive the identical security guaranteed by the Wisconsin Constitution to cast their votes secretly, like Wisconsin voters without disabilities.
Citizens with such disabilities can remotely receive an absentee ballot thanks to the judge’s order. In Wisconsin, just military personnel and those traveling abroad are now able to online obtain absentee ballots.  ,
According to the court’s notice of charm, Mitchell granted the progressive organizations ‘ request for urgent declaratory relief and a momentary order enjoining “provisions of the Wisconsin Statutes prohibiting municipal staff from distributing absentee ballots by email.” Additionally, the judge gave the Wisconsin Elections Commission the order to “improve the distribution of emailed votes to self-certifying print-disabled electors for the November 2024 public election.” Additionally, Mitchell stated that an emailed absentee ballot must be read and marked using online supporting technology, such as a screen reader, to be available.
According to Mitchell’s order, blind citizens would still need to gain completed vote in person or by mail as well as all other absent voters in the Badger State.  ,
” Almost 100, 000 Wisconsin individuals suffer from vision problems, according to data compiled by express health representatives”, The Associated Press reported.  ,
Changing the Rules
Misha Tseytlin, counsel for the Democrat politicians, said he forwarded The Federalist’s request for comment to his clients. The politicians have no responded. The GOP senators will say that Mitchell’s order, in part because it disrupts election rules later in the election year, was wrong in granting the temporary injunction, according to The Associated Press.  ,
Josh Kaul, the Badger State’s communist solicitor general, seems to agree with the GOP politicians. According to the AP, his lawyers at the Wisconsin Department of Justice claimed that altering the rules may create confusion and pose safety risks. Additionally, they assert that there is n’t enough time to train hundreds of state-wide local election officials about new procedures before the election.  ,
At a June 24 reading, Assistant Attorney General Karla Keckhaver told Mitchell,” This court cannot change the rules of the election right then,” regardless of how difficult or easy those changes are.  ,
Additionally, Mitchell’s purchase alters election laws that make it clear who can and can’t get absentee ballots online.
Republicans have long sought to stop challenges of election integrity, while Wisconsin Democrats have long attempted to expand mail-in election.  ,
Leftist Court of Last Resort
In a subsequent article, left-wing Republic Docket, founded by Russia’s document salesman and Democratic Party handyman Marc Elias, declares the apparent.  ,
As courts weigh a number of crucial matters, including the drop-box ban before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the state courts does have a say in where and how Wisconsinites cast their ballots this fall. The majority-liberal chair is considering whether to reject a majority-liberal selection in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, which “virtually prohibited the use of drop boxes in the state,” the communist lawfare-associated website information.  ,
The courts could be instrumental in determining the winner of the Wisconsin election, as they did in 2020, and ultimately who wins the White House. Mitchell demonstrated once more why Democrats and their adversaries ‘ complaints to the Dane County Circuit Court are handled by Wisconsin’s liberal-majority Supreme Court, which has already indicated how it will re-enter the race.  ,
Mitchell was chosen for the court’s inaugural term in 2016. He unsuccessfully ran for the state Supreme Court seat last year, but far-left candidate Janet Protasiewicz eventually won. She had repeatedly stated during her campaign that she would support the left’s agenda and has demonstrated this in her first year on the bench.  ,
Prior to joining the University of Wisconsin-Madison as the bench’s candidate for the Dane County, Mitchell was the university’s director of community relations. During a 2015 panel discussion, Mitchell, who is black, said law enforcement officials were too aggressive in arresting and prosecuting shoplifters stealing from “big box” stores. The retailers have insurance, after all.  ,
” I just do n’t think they should be prosecuting cases for people who steal from Wal-Mart,” he said at the time. ” I just do n’t think that. I do n’t think Target or all them other places, the big boxes that have insurance, that they should be using… the fact that people steal from there, justification to start engaging in aggressive police practices” . ,
Mitchell, who formerly worked as a prosecutor with the” social justice”- pushing Dane County district attorney’s office, declared that law enforcement agents cracking down on retail theft were justifying why” they’re going to overpolice our children” . ,
So perhaps it should come as no surprise that the far-left Dane County judge is being accused of breaking the law and maintaining election integrity as he significantly alters the Wisconsin election law from the bench.  ,
Matt Kittle covers The Federalist’s senior elections coverage. An award- winning investigative reporter and 30- year veteran of print, broadcast, and online journalism, Kittle previously served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.
