The Democrats ‘ open debate over what to do with Joe Biden’s issue must stop. They know, we know, and, most frighteningly, America’s enemies know that our captain- in- chief is mentally ignorant. The Constitution makes it clear that Joe Biden may be removed from office and the evil leader sworn in as president.
The only ( proper ) question for Biden and his party is whether the removal will be voluntary, under Section 3 of the 25th Amendment, or forced, under Section 4. Does Biden inform Congress that he has “his written charter that he is able to transfer the powers and responsibilities of his business”? Or will the vice chairman and the majority of the Cabinet notify Congress of President Biden’s inadequacy and oust him from power?
A day or two to determine is fair. A month stretches the limits. However, we are now at the place where Vice President Kamala Harris and the Cabinet’s silence constitute a sham against the terms of their oath of office. They sincerely swore that they would “bear true faith and loyalties” to the Constitution and that they would “faithfully release the tasks of the company.” According to that oath, they must declare to Congress that” the President is unable to transfer the powers and responsibilities of his business.”
There is no bounce area. No “wait and see” if the president can persuade the electorate that he is fit for company, whether through choreographed images or written prime-time conversations. Neither roll nor conspiracy theories may affect what the globe saw during the debate: Biden’s mental incapacity.
Whether caused by age, memory, or Alzheimer’s things no. If the president of the United States lacks even a small amount of clarity, he cannot carry out his duties. The commander-in-chief may be able to direct the senior branch 24- 7
Any shop is unconstitutional and social.
Yes, Biden has a large number of supporters who can and likely have made choices for him. However, our Constitution established a “unitary professional,” with the president being vested with the power to direct the executive branch. And the Constitution dictates what happens when that person, these Biden, is unable to discharge his tasks.
Removing Biden from business is politically fraught, yet, because he is even the Democrat’s presidential candidate. Some Democrats, in fact, seem focused solely on removing Biden from the ballot and not the president, disregarding the paradox they are advocating: that Joe Biden is qualified to run the country but not to run for reelection.
Progressives have no viable alternative with just four months until the general election, but they do have one democratic choice. Unfortunately, the legal option is likely even the best choice, socially speaking.  ,
By quickly removing Biden from company, Democrats can provide their agreement with a hanging president, Kamala Harris, to remove Biden on the vote. Instead of discussing whether to exchange Biden at the convention over the following month and a half, they may focus instead on finding a new member while attempting to avoid another public show of incompetence.
Democrats ‘” keeping Democracy” cry would be harmed if Biden were to be replaced at the convention because it would reject the party’s primary voters without justification. Democrats may also work to peacefully end any in-fights over Harris ‘ choice during that time by promising a strong vice-presidential member while rallying the party’s support.
This method would also be the worst choice for Republicans. While a President Harris might look a less fierce opponent, now that the populace knows Biden is ignorant, he would be the easiest Democrat to defeat come November, emotionally and policy- smart. Instead of demanding that Biden’s Cabinet and Vice President Harris issue a declaration of inadequacy, some congressional Republicans may choose to be silent. However, they also took the oath to “bear true devotion and affiliation” to the Constitution and “faithfully discharge the duties of the company.”
Our country and Constitution must come first, even though the sadness Democrats are currently experiencing is natural given that only two weeks ago the media accused those highlighting Joe Biden’s stupidity of being a” low fake.”
Of course, that does n’t mean Republicans would be without grounds to attack a presidential candidate Harris. Harris would have to defend her pause in requesting Biden’s ouster because the public has long been revealing Biden’s incompetence, The Federalist and others have been doing so for years. And as Biden’s vice president, Harris evidently knew he lacked the capacity to function as commander- in- general long ago. Yet she, like the other members of the administration, only acted once they realized they could no longer hide the truth from voters.
Harris ‘ continued support for Biden will only serve to reinforce this perception in voters ‘ minds, as will her ongoing inaction as she presses Biden’s and his family’s efforts to resurrect the image of the president. The Democrat Party will also find itself years in the dust from its efforts to support Joe Biden.
That does n’t mean they wo n’t win the 2024 presidential election though. Republicans would be foolish to believe that the Democrats ‘ current upheaval will prevent party supporters and activists from casting ballots, even if they are n’t yet familiar with the candidate for whom they will be collecting votes.
Margot Cleveland is an investigative journalist and legal analyst and serves as The Federalist’s senior legal correspondent. Margot’s work has been published at The Wall Street Journal, The American Spectator, the New Criterion, National Review Online, Townhall.com, the Daily Signal, USA Today, and the Detroit Free Press. She is also a regular guest on nationally syndicated radio programs and on Fox News, Fox Business, and Newsmax. Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the law school’s highest honor. She then worked for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals as a permanent law clerk for nearly 25 years. Former full-time university professor, Cleveland teaches adjunct occasionally. Cleveland serves as a lawyer for the New Civil Liberties Alliance. You can follow Cleveland on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland to learn more about her most cherished accomplishments, including her husband and son. Cleveland’s views are those expressed here in her personal capacity.