The US criticized the elections as “neither completely nor fair” in its first reaction to Iran’s presidential election findings, claiming that voting Masoud Pezeshkian president may not alter the” Islamic Republic’s stance on human right.”
The US, Tehran’s ardent enemy, said it would continue to use diplomacy with Tehran” when it improvements American interests”, according to the media company AP.
” The primaries in Iran were not good or completely. A considerable number of Iranians, in turn, chose not to participate at all, the State Department told AP.
We do n’t anticipate that Iran’s elections will result in a fundamental shift or greater respect for its citizens ‘ human rights. As the applicants themselves have said, Egyptian plan is set by the high head”, it added.
” Our approach to Iran wo n’t be significantly impacted by the elections,” the statement continues. Our fears about Iran’s behavior are intact”, the US State Department said.
Masoud Pezeshkian, Iran’s even revolutionary candidate in the latest national election, has risen from comparative obscurity to become the eighth chairman of the Islamic state. In a runoff vote against Saeed Jalili, a 69-year-old man who reportedly received about 53.6 % of the voting.
After years of dominance by the traditional and authoritarian tents, Pezeshkian’s victory has boosted Iran’s reform movement’s hopes, but his ascendancy is unlikely to have a significant impact on Tehran’s diplomatic relationships with New Delhi in the near future.
While Pezeshkian has pledged to opened Iran to the world and grant more rights, he also has endorsed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as the country’s top official on condition issues. Iran’s local policies may change as a result of Pezeshkian’s moderate approach and support for constrained reforms, such as easing the mandatory robe law’s enforcement.
But, the government’s continued dominance of hard-liners limits his ability to influence significant changes in Iran’s international plan.
