Joe Biden claimed he was running for president of the Democrats on Sunday because he thought it was “in the best interest of]his group and the nation.” Biden promised to address the nation after this week with more information about his decision, though he did not go into further detail.
When he finally addresses the audience, Biden will probably present himself as a contemporary hero, withdrawing from the race to defend America from Donald Trump’s existential threat. Whether Biden mentions his terrible conversation effectiveness remains to be seen, but if he does, the leader will definitely shape the sight as he has over the last three weeks: as a mistake, a bad night, or caused by jet lag or by Trump’s off-mic interruptions. Left unanswered is the fact that Democrat mega-donors and party executives pressured Trump to step down out of fear that Trump did win the presidency once more.
These factors, however, are all diversion, seeking to deflect the state from what they witnessed during the discussion: a commander-in-chief suffering from a psychological incompetence.
Indeed, the president’s cognitive impairment scandal led Democrats to believe Biden could n’t win reelection, and that realization led to his departure from the competition. However, it is n’t significant why Biden bowed out as the Democrat nominee or why Biden or others claim he did it.  ,
Otherwise, what matters is that Biden lacks a robust intellectual power. That is important because a person who lacks sobriety, even if he occasionally does, is unable to carry out the duties and responsibilities of the leader. As I wrote after the conversation,” Whether caused by age, memory, or Alzheimer’s things not. If the president of the United States lacks even a fraction of the day’s worth of sobriety, he cannot release his duties. The commander-in-chief may be able to control the senior tree 24-7″.
Biden’s removal as a applicant is not enough, he must withdraw from the president, or the cupboard may invoke the 25th Amendment.
Democrats and their media pawns may pretend otherwise, claiming that Biden simply lacks the endurance to strategy and that his illness does not interfere with his ability to serve as commander-in-chief. But during the conversation, Biden was n’t lacking in strength. He was lacking in sobriety.
Big-time Democrat supporter George Clooney quickly confirmed Biden’s mental incapacitation by claiming that the person he saw at a June fundraiser “was the exact person we all witnessed at the conversation.” In his New York Times op-ed to stop claiming” that 51 million people did n’t see what we just saw,” Clooney said during the discussion.
Democrats, including Joe Biden, will pretend the country never saw an old, frail man, even though they do.  ,
No so.
During the conversation, Biden clearly showed he was lacking in emotional skills. That disconcerting performance confirmed the several previous occasions in which Americans saw a president with cognitive disabilities.  ,
Contribute to those facts Special Counsel Robert Hur’s assumption that Biden had “likely provide himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a compassionate, well-meaning, old man with a bad memory”. In addition, Biden’s disturbing memory lapses were more detailed in Hur’s report, and it was advised against prosecuting the president for handling sensitive documents improperly. The attorney general’s decision to release the voice of Hur’s conversations with Biden simply serves to reinforce the impression that the audio is even worse than the special counsel’s account.
Notwithstanding the press’s initial coverage of Joe Biden’s disastrous debate performance, the press did n’t find journalism. Reporters may now resume covering for the leader after the president has been pulled out of the race. Americans, while, know the truth — that President Biden is intellectually intoxicated. Unfortunately, so do our foes.
Margot Cleveland is an investigative journalist and legal researcher and serves as The Federalist’s older legitimate journalist. Margot’s work has been published at The Wall Street Journal, The American Spectator, the New Criterion, National Review Online, Townhall.com, the Daily Signal, USA Today, and the Detroit Free Press. She is also a typical visitor on nationally syndicated radio programs and on Fox News, Fox Business, and Newsmax. Cleveland is a attorney and a student of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize—the laws school’s highest respect. She later served on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals as a continuous law clerk for a national administrative judge for nearly 25 years. Previous full-time college professor, Cleveland teaches adjunct occasionally. The New Civil Liberties Alliance even has Cleveland as its attorney. Cleveland is a follower of her greatest accomplishments, her dear father and dear brother, on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. Cleveland’s opinions are those of her personal life in this article.
