If Given the Choice, Would You Want a Male or Female Secret Service Agent Protecting You?

During the House Oversight Committee hearing on the Secret Service’s loss on July 13, it became clear that Director Kimberly Cheatle is both a completely incompetent or a brazen liar. She has been fired for the job, completely cease, for refusing to answer the most fundamental inquiries about the killing that almost killed Donald Trump. She and other ignorant Secret Service officials at the organization must be fired, too. &nbsp,

Among other things, she revealed that she did n’t sign off on Trump’s protective plan that day. In fact, she does n’t sign off on any of the plans. She also acknowledged that she has n’t taken the time to go to the shooting site despite being deeply involved in the alleged investigation into her agency’s failures ( where she is focusing her efforts ). &nbsp,

One question that was raised frequently during the reading was whether the agency’s sexual agents were qualified for the position. Last season, Cheatle announced a goal of 30 % female volunteers, along with a whole host of diversity actions. &nbsp,

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn. ) called Cheatle a” DE I horror story” .&nbsp,

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass. ) because she is the only one to accuse Republican of racism and misogyny. &nbsp,

Democrats have used this situation to remain to criticize initiatives promoting gender equality and racial justice in America. Unsatisfactory, but hardly shocking. I’m not going to repeat their discriminatory and derogatory themes. In conclusion, Republicans have falsely and cruelly claimed that hiring women and people of color hampered the answer to the shooting. This is terrible in the midst of firearm violence and tragic loss of life, and it is part of Democratic strategy to continually criticize required diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts to undermine the contributions made by women, people of color, the disability community, and others every day.

Asked about variety workers at the company, Cheatle replied that she’s focused on hiring the “best and brightest” and “best-qualified prospects”.

But is that real? &nbsp,

I wrote this on our liveblog the day of the killing: &nbsp,

The rhinoceros in the room, people in the Secret Service, is now the subject of an adult conversation. The question must be asked: Was Trump’s security detail compromised by diversity hires ( women, gays, trans people, etc. )? It is unquestionable that people are stronger and more quickly than people in the case of people. No one other than the terribly deluded DEI executioner holds a different opinion. This table was posted on X now by people using the moniker @eyeslasho:

It shows how the actual fitness standards are lower for adult Secret Service trainees—in this circumstance, pushups, with people’s scores on the left. For a person to be considered” Exceptional” in the 20s time group, he had complete 55 reps, for a person, it’s just 40. Women can still be regarded as” Good” with only 26 pushups. ( Note: a man in his 20s should be able to do WAY more than 55 pushups. ) &nbsp,

Eyeslasho added,” Astonishingly, a total of only 6 items is required to complete the four-element test”, which includes reps, sit-ups, chin-ups, and a 1.5 mile run. &nbsp,” And even if you do n’t report 6 details, you can still be admitted upon more’ review and suggestion.'”

” Nevertheless, I’m not impressed by what is actually required of those who enter the Key Service”, he concluded. &nbsp,

Neither am I. &nbsp,

We’ve all seen images of a bloody Trump surrounded by his protecting information. The men on the staff were large enough to house their heads between Trump’s mind and the gunman, the feminine agent was considerably shorter, exposing Trump’s head. &nbsp,

Make no mistake: The agent in the picture above was incredibly brave. Without a doubt, she firmly placed her body between Trump and the shooter, and she merits praise. She should not have been a victim of the Secret Service’s decision to hire her because she is shorter than the male agents. &nbsp,

Diversity, for its own sake, is ridiculous, diversity in jobs where someone’s life is on the line could be deadly. &nbsp,

Some of the female law enforcement officers I work with are absolute beasts in the gym. However, the most powerful women in the gym ca n’t compete with the weaker men in strength tests. &nbsp,

If I place my life in the hands of the Secret Service, I want the strongest, fastest, and best-trained agent possible. Women can be incredibly strong, physically fit, and certainly well-trained. However, if I had to choose between a man and a woman of comparable age and training, I’d always choose the man. I want the man with huge biceps and legs like tree trunks if they have to carry my lifeless body off a dais. ” Yasss girl power”! is going to ruin it. &nbsp,

Yes, I know it’s not politically correct to speak about gender in a way that suggests women ≠ to men, but as the managing editor of PJ Media, I do n’t demand political correctness. I do n’t force writers to use “preferred genders”, unlike other sites ( one of which rhymes with “box” ). That decision has gotten us demonetized, throttled, and censored, but we refuse to back down. You should not demand anything less from the websites you use. &nbsp,

Please join the VIP community today if you want to support this policy. For a limited time, we are offering 60 % off memberships. For$ 1.68 per month, you can support our conservative journalism and analysis. In return, you’ll gain access to hundreds of exclusive, members-only articles every month. For a few bucks more, you can level up to GOLD and get exclusive content at PJ Media, Townhall, RedState, Twitchy, HotAir, and Bearing Arms, plus live chats with your favorite contributors across all the sites. Sign up here today! &nbsp,

Source credit