Business advertising claimed the presumed 2024 Democrat candidate was not tasked with overseeing the logistics of the record-breaking war years after President Joe Biden acknowledged and even praised him for calling Vice President Kamala Harris the “border czar.”
In March 2021, Biden initially charged Harris with leading “our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle and the countries that help — are going to need help… are going to need assist… in stemming the movement of so many people, stemming the migration to our southeastern border.” He claimed at the time that the former California attorney general and lawmaker was” the most skilled people to do it.”
Harris did n’t do much with the title and task. Yet her delayed and seriously staged border crossing was met with celebration from her allies in the media.
This child-glove treatment grew more prominent recently as a result of corporate media’s accusations of those who were critical of Harris ‘ failure to do anything but exacerbate the Biden administration’s campaign-incented invasion of making the VP a” convenient scapegoat.”
According to The Wall Street Journal,” Harris’s work was meant to be narrow, and over the years Harris has fulfilled it by announcing tranches of personal assets by firms like Pepsi, Cargill, and Nestle in Central America.”
Axios claimed in an X article on Wednesday that Republicans were mistaken to criticize Harris for having “never really had” the name border czar.
The site’s claims that the Trump campaign and Republicans like House GOP Chair Elise Stefanik badly labeled Harris ‘ part fall short in spite of its own monitoring, which repeatedly described him as Biden’s border king.
In a March 2021 content, the same Axios writer who claimed Biden had put Harris in charge of the border crisis claimed that Harris was merely meant” to help with a cut of the migration issue.”
Shortly after it was published, Axios included a statement from the writer’s note stating that the story “was one of the media outlets that wrong called Harris a “border czar.”
Why do magazines like Axios lie about everything its own websites contradict, aside from the typical motivations for the corporate press to purposefully alter the tale?
Because the frontier has been and continues to be a “political bomb” for the Democrats who destroyed it. In her most recent article, Stephen W. Kight stated in her most explicit way that she wanted to indicate that it “has become even more important for Harris to find a clear border message, quickly.”
Kight remarked that Harris ‘ campaign could benefit from making a clear immigration pitch to voters because she is “personally knowledgeable and invested in the issue” and that Harris ‘ rise on the ticket is “invigorated by her rise on the issue.”
Politifact, known for aiding Big Tech’s censorship efforts by printing false fact-checks designed to vilify political dissenters, also joined in the propaganda dogpile when it claimed that Harris was only “assigned to handle immigration’s causes, no border security”.
USA Today, similarly, published a “fact-check” that deemed the claim that Harris was the presidential pick to oversee the skyrocketing number of illegal crossings “exaggerates the vice president’s role in addressing migration at the southern border”.
One quick look at Biden’s border czar pronouncement in 2021 suggests the opposite.
Biden noted that he was tasked with a” similar assignment” to “determine the best way to keep people from coming is keep them from wanting to leave” during the Obama administration.
The Vice President has agreed to lead our diplomatic effort and work with those nations to improve migration enforcement at their borders, among other things, and I appreciate it.
In addition, Harris stated in her acceptance that” we will enforce the law.”
The Biden administration’s actual border story is still that it orchestrated the world’s most deadly invasion without facing any charges. Corporate media, however, are more interested in running propaganda to help Democrats ‘ 2024 election chances instead of covering how Americans are suffering the consequences — like violent crime,  , fatal drugs, and , infrastructure problems — that are directly linked to the ongoing influx of illegal border crossers.
The Federalist staff writer and host of The Federalist Radio Hour, Jordan Boyd. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire, Fox News, and RealClearPolitics. Jordan graduated from Baylor University with a political science major and a journalism minor. Follow her on X @jordanboydtx.
