Doctors who are under increasing legal and professional strain to have abortions post-Dobbs establish that they are not required to have abortions in medication. The word “emergency pregnancy” is a fear technique.
The Department of Health and Human Services under the Biden administration immediately issued letters to physicians citing the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, which mandated that abortions be treated as “emergency attention.”
The Biden administration reiterated that message in early July, in a letter sent to physician and hospital associations, compelling emergency room ( ER ) doctors to perform abortions to” stabilize” a woman’s “emergency medical condition”.
Public Ignorance, Political Gain
Following several doctors ‘ being targeted by credentialing board and the U.S. government for their anti-abortion approach post-Dobbs, the Association for American Physicians and Surgeons filed a lawsuit. Social speech is still permeated by public ignorance and confusion regarding a “necessary” abortion, and Biden’s principle is yet another authoritarian attempt to install national “must-haves” in politics.
According to John Seeds, past office chair of obstetrics and gynecology at Virginia Commonwealth University, an unnamed Food and Drug Administration committee determines “arbitrary security standards” and what “emergency employ” and “necessity,” and can then use those standards to deceive the public on the subject of abortion.
Seeds backed a bill in Virginia that would alter the health department’s guidelines for abortionists and require providers to document any major complications associated with an abortion.  ,
” We should want to know if problems are clustering, and where”, Grains told me. ” I said,’ How can anyone say for knowledge?’ The pro-abortion persons argued for knowledge. At the committee meeting, they stated that. Disgusting. There is no expert academic integrity”.
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Developments
Since the legislation of pregnancy 50 years ago, great strides have been made in maternal and neonatal care, with validity improving from 27 to 22 weeks birth, said Dr. John Bruchalski, a previous abortionist who now runs Tepeyac OB-GYN, the largest pro-life OB-GYN training in the country.
” You also have to provide an abortion if a person wants it,” Bruchalski said,” but what these “emergency abortion” laws are saying is if there is a different medical approach to the situation, like true medical care or restoration to closely follow the patient’s course of disease,” according to Bruchalski.
According to Bruchalski, the two main situations, first-trimester bleeding and ectopic pregnancy, require distinct treatments without an abortion.
” In]catastrophic uterine bleeding ] you’re targeting the placenta and its removal because that is the cause of bleeding, the preborn child is not your target”, Bruchalski said.
An OB-GYN removes the damaged portion of the reproductive tubes that contains the embryo in the event of an ectopic pregnancy.
” This is academically and scientifically certainly a strong abortion”, Bruchalski said. The purpose of an elected contraception is to end a newborn ‘ life. The individual and the job as well as the doctor must know the truth and the intention.
In the vast majority of instances of ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages, the preborn child has now died due to the disease, Bruchalski said. In either scenario, targeting the child is never the purpose and is therefore not an abortion, but pregnancy experts mislead physicians and patients by saying ectopic pregnancies, abortions, and democratic abortions are all the same.
” This force is based on underlying lies and half-truths, from beginning to end”, Bruchalski said.
Michelle Stroud Johnson, a registered nurse with experience in maternal mother and newborn care, acknowledges that no disaster situation calls for an pregnancy.
Because the baby is not yet “ready,” Johnson said,” there are times when the baby needs more support for the baby because it is essential for the mother’s well-being,” Johnson said. ” But, there is never a situation that the mother’s health may benefit from the death of her unborn baby. There is never a reason to stop the baby’s life in the hope of saving mother, even in correct fall C-sections where the mother actually has to be in the OR [operating place ] within minutes.
” The discussion of an ER abortion of a healthy pregnancy is bogus,” Grains claimed.
Pregnancy in healthcare has political backing
Over the past 40 years, the number of abortion services has strongly decreased, but pregnancy is still a problem because of the increase in substance abortions and Supreme Court acceptance.
” Seventy-seven to 93 percent of OB-GYNs do not perform abortions”, Bruchalski said. Because abortion was and continues to be the killing and elimination of a human being, it belongs in a profession that was established to first provide no harm, and its providers have been in the shadows and margins of medical practice since the beginning. He described it as “viscerally brutal and barbaric procedure for the doctor, the woman, and of course the preborn child.”
Reinventing the dangerous “back-alley abortion” that abortion advocates once wielded as an argument for legalization, chemical abortions are “messy, dirty and dangerous … with no oversight and no follow-up care except the ER, and there they are counseled to say they have miscarried”, Bruchalski said.
” I thought personalized medicine was more genetically sound, scientifically sound, psychologically sound, anthropologically sound, anatomically sound”, he said. However, when it comes to abortion, we distance the woman from her unborn child, we encourage deception when asked about her medical history, and we can now provide the abortion without blood tests, doctor visits, or ultrasounds to confirm what the patient tells us about her most recent period for dating. With telehealth abortions, there is no doctor visit, no exam, and no ability to date the age of a preborn child, he added.
Misinformed Consent
According to Dr. Tim Millea, chairman of the Catholic Medical Association’s task force on conscience and policy,” the messaging from the pro-abortion community is replete with misinformation and fabricating information about what pro-life medicine offers to mothers and their babies.” This is especially true for ectopics and the “ER abortion,” she said.
Medical oversight, developed to prevent or decrease medically caused complications during treatment, is misdirected during an abortion, Bruchalski said. ” Words are used to obfuscate, there’s not a good data collection program, and it’s one smokescreen after another”.
Parents are not informed about fetal development and other procedural realities, according to Johnson. There have been numerous instances where the parents have been urged to seek abortion because of concerns about the baby’s health or maternal health issues. I’ve even heard of this referred to as a’ compassionate abortion.’ However, the reality is far from understanding: “babies absolutely do experience pain when they are ripped apart in the womb.”
Pro-life Care Is Better Care for Women
Pro-life doctors do not view the unborn baby as a” clinical problem” that needs to be addressed or eliminated, Millea said. The emphasis is placed on addressing the real issue or issues affecting mother and child as much as possible in order to ensure both of them ‘ health and survival.
Abortion is never equated to superior care, according to Bruchalski, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention refer to as the intentional end of a fetus. And doctors who promote life never place a mother in the position of her unborn child.
Every day, women are being told lies about the realities of abortion, according to Johnson, who said they must endure the consequences.
‘ States Rights ‘ Approach, Professional Demise
Republicans in their bid for office are polarizing on life issues, asserting that state and emergency rights preclude the rights of the unborn, and that abortion should n’t be ruled out by federal authority.
Republican legislators could hide their personal beliefs on abortion behind the legality to win pro-life support, according to Bruchalski. Dobbs has forced them to be more open and honest about their commitment to life-affirming principles.
Elites in charge effectively shut down discussion and debate, central to the scientific method, during the Covid pandemic, and the OB-GYN profession is following suit, Bruchalski said.
” Now in OB-GYN]there exists ] the ruse that elective abortion is critically vital to reproductive health care”, Bruchalski said. ” We all deserve better than this”.
Ashley Bateman blogs for Ascension Press and writes for The Heartland Institute about policy. Her work has been featured in The Washington Times, The Daily Caller, The New York Post, The American Thinker and numerous other publications. She previously held positions as editor, writer, and photographer for The Warner Weekly, a publication for the German-speaking American military community in Bamberg. She previously held positions as adjunct scholars for The Lexington Institute. A Catholic homeschool cooperative in Virginia has Ashley on the board. Along with her brilliant engineer/scientist husband, she educates four of her incredible children at home.
