JD Vance, a Republican Party member and vice presidential candidate for Ohio, called it disgusting that a Hollywood star had spoken about her two-year-old child and pleaded with her to not experience fertility issues. In the Megyn Kelly demonstrate where JD Vance defended her ‘ single rabbit women ‘ opinion, without naming Jennifer Aniston, he said it was disgusting.
If a Hollywood star says,” Oh JD Vance,” then what if your child has ovulation issues, which is disgusting because my child is two years old and, as I said in the talk, I would do everything to assist her because I think having children and children is a good thing. That’s the whole stage”, JD Vance said. He made the comment about Kamala Harris ‘” single cat women” remark. People who are anti-child and anti-family were not the target of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Pete Buttigieg’s attention, but they were also targeted at those who ca n’t have children. He said The Democrat party has become anti-family.
Jennifer Aniston reacted furiously to the row, calling it amazing for a possible vice president applicant. All I may say is,” Mr. Vance, I pray that your child is fortunate enough to have children of her own one day. I’m hoping that she wo n’t need to use IVF as a second option. Because you’re trying to take that apart from her, too,” the artist wrote in a powerful letter to the outcry against JD Vance.
Jennifer Aniston, in the past, spoke about her fight while trying to conceive through IVF.
JD Vance stated in an interview with Fox News in 2021 that the nation was being run by a group of single rabbit women who “are terrible at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, and they want to make the rest of the country wretched as well.”
” It’s just a simple fact — you look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC — the whole prospect of the Democrats is controlled by people without kids. And how is it possible that we turned over people’s real stakes in our nation? Vance said.
Vance signed onto a speech with his Republican colleagues saying they” strongly support continued global access to IVF” in contrast to a Democratic costs that sought to protect and grow access to such fertility treatments.
