Sen. Elizabeth Warren claimed on CNN last week that Kamala Harris ‘ “biggest success” as vice chairman was being the first sitting vice president to attend an pregnancy center, a move that minimized the difficulties of expecting parents and made her a saleswoman of hurt and heartache.
Americans should be especially concerned about her outspoken press for unlimited abortion up until baby, despite there being a number of reasons to oppose a Harris president.
Even the most pro-abortion voters, let alone vulnerable mothers who are experiencing unexpected or unwanted pregnancy, are frightened by Harris ‘ radical record on abortion.
Unlike Biden, Harris is frightened to aggressively explain her group’s mission for unrestricted access to pregnancy. She has also consistently refrained from mentioning any restrictions on contraception that she would be willing to support.
She intentionally , evaded , inquiries about her stance on fair pro-life protections during an exam last year with Margaret Brennan on CBS ‘” Face the Nation”. Harris is attempting to compel all 50 states to allow even agonizing late-term pregnancies at every month of pregnancy, a place that is so intense that it completely defies the attitude of the majority of Americans who support fair pregnancy protections after three months of birth.
Harris’s long-standing position on abortion even highlights her lack of concern for children’s frequently complex and perplexing thoughts surrounding abortion. Mothers who have abortions usually complain that the process is “inconsistent with their beliefs and choices.” And far too many mothers — , 97 percent , — who visit pregnancy centers in times of stress are offered the one-size-fits-all answer: pregnancy is the only way forward, leading some to experience deep feelings of , regret , for years to come, a point to which Harris repeatedly turns a blind attention.
In her capacity as solicitor general of California, Harris went so far as to criticize pro-life Americans and their efforts to secure protection and integrated care for women and their children. As AG, she stood casually by when Planned Parenthood was  , found , to had harvested and sold abandoned child body parts in 2015. She therefore launched a socially driven , prosecution , of voter editors like David Daleiden at the Center for Medical Progress, instead of investigating Planned Parenthood’s violent and degrading activity.
]READ: Kamala Harris’s Relentless Prosecution Of Pro-Life Journalist Lives On 7 Years After ]
Soon thereafter, as a senator from California, she solidified her far-reaching pregnancy status through similarly far-reaching legislative steps, making her one of the most anti-life officials in the country. Harris , voted , against a bill protecting the unborn from abortion after 20 weeks ‘ gestation, long after the point at which science , shows , children in the womb are capable of feeling pain.
More than once, she , voted against , legislation that would have provided babies who survive abortion attempts with the same medical care as any other child. Worst of all, she co-sponsored the misleading” Women’s Health Protection Act,” which was created with the intention of putting an end to healthy babies with the potential to become beloved sons and daughters in all 50 states.
Today, Harris continues to mislead American women and their families into believing that she is considering their best interests. She would continue to do so while serving as the commander in chief thanks to a false abortion myth. In the run-up to the election day, Harris will have to contend with Americans who are better than disingenuous politicians who believe they are better than the very citizens who go through the effects of dangerous abortive policies and talking points.
