The host nation can experience a sense of national pride and honor its distinctive past and traditions during the Summer Olympic Games ‘ entry service.
Any jokes about timidity or cheese-loving apart, France certainly occupies a place as one of the arches of Western society, with huge contributions to literature, arts, and science. It had the opportunity to show the world a lively and resilient nation ready to prosper in the 21st century, particularly after a symbiotic relationship with the world in the form of an election earlier in July, drawing upon a rich history and culture.
Instead, France made the decision to highlight the female mania and decadence that are slowly but surely ravaging the West.
A freakshow adaptation of Leonardo da Vinci’s” The Last Supper,” which featured transgender performers and a Blue Man Group adaptation of Dionysus, the Greek god of wine and debauchery, was performed at last week’s opening ceremony in Paris. Some viewers pointed out the bizarre existence of a child in this female carnival without delay.
The picture was dubbed the” New Gay Testament,” and the gay activist and DJ named Barbara Butch, who held the same position as Jesus in the classic painting.
After global backlash, Olympic officials have scrambled to gaslight the audience, insisting that any similarity to” The Last Supper” was” completely unintentional” and that” there was never any intention to show disrespect towards any religious group or belief”.
Anyone who is even a passing familiar with Christian symbolism and LGBT activists ‘ obsession with subverting it is clearly making false justifications for those who use those mistakes, which are further undermined by the fact that different elements of the ceremony displayed the same level of disregard for morality.
The performance ended in a parade and three persons ( two males and one woman ) heading home to participate in a ménage à trois to finish off the profanity. They begin eating their appetites again inside an room before one of them shuts the door on the market. Fortunately, they made a stop there!
Why did the promoters do this, John Davidson, my partner, asked? Put plainly, they did it because they hate Jesus Christ and Christianity, which they consider their most dangerous enemy. They are currently very receptive to this.
That profane display was a profane representation of the influence they currently have over American culture. They are aware that they can mock the very foundation of our society in front of a crowd of tens of millions and get clapping for it.
The best the , gay Paris Olympics ‘ creative director, and sex performers had come up with is severely undermining other people’s musical successes. They did n’t think up their own world, symbols, and referents, they just sabotaged others ‘ then pretended what any three-year-old can do is brilliant”, my colleague Joy Pullmann wrote.
They ca n’t do anything but mock and deface and corrupt that which is sacred, meaningful, and beautiful. Because of their own bizarre and unnatural perspective of the world, they are wholly incapable of producing something worthwhile. So they must pull everything else over in their self-loathing to break free of reality and morality.
NBC Sports described the meeting as celebrating “liberation” in one of its video of a category featuring the French Revolution ( complete with a mutilated Marie Antoinette ).
To these people, “liberation” does n’t mean the overthrow of a tyrannical monarch or the creation of a free civil society, even though they constantly frame their own struggle in those terms. A “liberation” is defined as a condition in which all cultural norms are completely broken, as well as the right to indulge in any and all physical desires. If society achieves its extreme sexual freedom, they have no objections to destroying or desecrating it. In reality, for many it has become equivalent to a passion.
God, tradition, history, and even the concept of civil society place restrictions and expectations on their behavior, and they ca n’t stand it. They have a bright anger for what they perceive as the columns of a functioning society, which is what a long range of European philosophers, from Rousseau to Foucault, see.
Any country that has a significant influence on shaping the modern world as France does does honor it whenever they can. Any sense of national pride or personality, however, threatens the strength and mission of the communist rulers of Europe and the United States. If Western countries begin to think of themselves as royal nation-states repeatedly, support for unrestrained Third World immigration, modernization, and one currencies may decrease.
The left had likewise beg that any starting ceremony that honors a host nation’s history’s background and greatness had “prove” problematic aspects of that country’s history or draw uncomfortable parallels with the militaristic bravado of fascist regimes.
But the response is straightforward: It works.
The opening ceremony in Beijing 2008 was a propaganda glory for the Chinese. That entry ceremony featured everything that one would anticipate from a growing global energy. People were able to see that China was posing a very real economic and political threat, especially as the rest of the world struggled under a long-lasting financial crisis.
Nothing about how this service was choreographed was an injury. In order to honor their country, the organizers made the conscious decision to incorporate transgender performers, a child in the middle of those hypersexualized performers, and plainly mock Christianity.
How one’s society is represented on the world stage is a decision, just as drop is a choice.
The host nation’s strength and brilliance should be praised during an Olympic entry service. And any starting meeting in a European country should drive home the West’s claim to be the most outstanding culture that the world has ever witnessed or, more importantly, will ever see.
For all the international challenges rising up to threaten its identity, the West’s crisis of confidence is by far the most harmful. And reminding Westerners whenever possible of what made their countries fantastic and ensuring that greatness will continue is the best way to stop that inner decay.
France preferably indicated that the West was determined to carry on its unstoppable descent into total hedonism. If the opening ceremony of the Summer Olympics allows a country to reflect on its accomplishments and, finally, look forward to its potential, this week’s meeting clearly demonstrates that the West has no upcoming.
Hayden Daniel is a team editor at The Federalist. He formerly held positions as deputy editor/opinion director at The Daily Caller and as an editor at The Daily Wire. He received his B. Washington and Lee University offers an A. in German Story with minors in theory and masterpieces. Following him on Twitter at @HaydenWDaniel
