In one CU Boulder department, two scholars properly persuaded their classmates to utilize services statements rather than La statements.
Some academic decisions have been criticized for their increasing use of diversity, equity, and inclusion criteria in hiring and promotion decisions, with some arguing that DEI requirements serve as intellectual litmus tests.
But, Professors Matthew Burgess and Peter Newton recently tried to implement such plans in a constructive way. Provide the” support speech”.
In a late July interview with The College Fix, Newton stated that” support is much broader than something related to DEI” and that a diversity speech and a service statement are two important practical differences.
” That includes working as a reviewer or director for a blog, or serving on a syllabus council or hiring commission in a school office, or]engaging in ] public awareness or public speaking”, he said.
Last fall, both Burgess and Newton helped spearhead a successful campaign at CU Boulder to persuade their fellow professors to abandon plans to require La statements from university job applicants and apply service statements.
The two, in a May part for Heterodox Academy,  , called on scientists nationwide to following suit.
” We believe company claims are a progressive, legal, ethical, and creative alternative to diversification claims for several reasons”, they wrote.
Burgess, who has since taken a place in the University of Wyoming’s Department of Economics, said support is harder to categorise than La statements, providing examples of referral he does related to political fragmentation. In a telephone interview from July, Burgess stated that it also leaves the door open for those who do more common Della work to discuss those interests.
Working with local high school students or speaking at a research shop are other alternatives Newton suggested for actions that could be discussed in a company statement. For recently minted PhDs, Newton added, also talking about aspirations of coming service may be appropriate.
The only main limitations on what types of services does count as acceptable for a support statement, Burgess noted, is that the service discussed should still be related to one’s institution, department, community, or profession. Although he claimed to be a supporter of Habitat for Humanity, volunteering for the organization would be unrelated to his statement, as would pure political activism.
The two academics successfully persuaded CU Boulder’s environmental studies department to update hiring procedures to mandate a service statement from potential job candidates in their Heterodox Academy piece.
When asked what inspired the development of the concept for service statements, Newton responded,” I believe it was inspired by members of our JEDI committee as it is known in our department, drafting a document outlining best practices for hiring or inclusive hiring.”
According to Newton, the document from JEDI– which stands for Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion – covered” all sorts of things in terms of the composition of a search committee and how to conduct interviews, as well as whether and how to ask candidates to submit a diversity statement or DEI statement”.
” Matt] Burgess ] and I, and I believe at least some other faculty in our department, had some concerns about whether]such a requirement ] was either necessary or useful or desirable”, Newton said.
Burgess added that they” shared many of the issues that have been raised nationally regarding using DEI statements in hiring.”
He claimed that these concerns stemmed from attempts to circumvent California’s anti-discrimination laws and apply DEI statements against people from less privileged backgrounds, as well as the possibility that DEI statements violate the First Amendment of the US Constitution and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
In addition to Burgess and Newton’s article for The Chronicle of Higher Education, they also went into greater detail about these issues in an earlier proposal that was distributed within their department.
Newton and Burgess began discussions about what an alternative to a DEI statement might look like after discussions with the document’s JEDI committee, according to Newton.
According to Newton, “one option would be to ask nothing and just to stick to what we used to do,” he said.” Obviously, one alternative would be to ask nothing and to stick to what we used to do,” he said.
” That, I think, we thought might be seen as a little regressive and there are, I think, useful things…that can come out in DEI statements”, he added.
” Service is part of faculty positions”, said Burgess,” and it’s great if people are doing service or are doing, you know, teaching or are even doing research in ways that build better pipelines for people from disadvantaged backgrounds …]or ] are trying to explore evidence-based methods for reaching people better across a broad range of backgrounds and preparations”.
Additionally, as they mentioned in their blog post, service statements correspond more closely to what is expected of faculty members at CU Boulder’s Department of Environmental Studies upon hiring.
” So basically, our argument was, you know, here’s a way that we can keep all the parts that are good and non-controversial about DEI statements, but carve out the parts that are…controversial if not, as I would argue, illegal”, Burgess said.
However, according to their blog post, their initial attempt to establish service statements in the Department of Environmental Studies at CU Boulder failed, in part because they worried that the inclusion of a service statement requirement would support several DEI statements in Burgess and Newton’s initial proposal and partly because they allegedly threatened to disrupt student activists.
However, Newton and Burgess wrote that they had revised the proposal by adding a provision “requesting applicants to provide an indication of how they would contribute to the department’s strategic imperatives” following the initial defeat.
” In a subtle change”, they wrote,” the revised version explicitly asked them to speak to all three strategic imperatives. One of those imperatives refers to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion”. They noted it “is broad and refers to ‘ diverse backgrounds, experiences, identities, and ideas,’ so a new faculty member could equally contribute to this imperative by, for example, fostering viewpoint diversity”.
” At a second vote”, they wrote,” the policy change passed unanimously with little discussion”.
This second — successful — vote, Newton said, took place in 2023.
Both Burgess and Newton responded to a question from The Fix about whether service statements could be abused or distorted in a way that, inconsequentially favors more established forms of DEI activity over more traditional forms of DEI activity.
However, Burgess continued,” It was my strong impression that the department diligently applied this new policy in the intended manner.” It was undoubtedly not used in a way that would serve as a “fig leaf” for the previous policy.
MORE: DEI statement mandatory for Bates College earth science faculty applicants
IMAGE: Teerasan Phutthigorn / Shutterstock
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
