A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google’s improperly maintaining a monopoly on online queries was infringing on antitrust regulations.
The much-anticipated choice represents a major victory for federal regulators who are attempting to stifle Big Tech’s influence and could sputter the tech industry. Other companies, including Apple, Meta and Amazon,  , even mouth national antitrust claims.
” After having thoroughly considered and weighed the see testimony and proof, the jury reaches the following conclusion: Google is a corporation, and it has acted as one to keep its monopoly”, U. S. District Judge Amit Mehta wrote in his mind.
The decision did not contain a treatment for Google’s conduct.
Kent Walker, chairman of Google Global Affairs, said in a speech that the company plans to appeal.
” This decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we should n’t be allowed to make it easily available”, he said. We will continue to concentrate on creating products that people will find useful and simple to use as this process progresses.
Regulators claimed that Google continued to be the dominant player in online searches by entering agreements with computer developers, phone manufacturers, and cellular providers to pre-load their goods using Google as the default.
According to the decision, the organizations receive a percentage of the advertising revenue that Google makes from its partnership with Google by agreeing to do so.
In 2021, Google paid out a total of$ 26.3 billion in revenue share under its contracts with browser developers Apple and Mozilla, major manufacturers of Android devices such as Samsung and Motorola, and U. S. wireless carriers including AT&, T and Verizon, according to the ruling.
That number was Google’s greatest charge that time, the ruling said. That same year, Google earned more than$ 146 billion in advertising revenue, according to the ruling.
” These supply deals have forced Google’s foes to find other ways to achieve people”, the decision said.
Alphabet Inc.’s Mountain View-based company has increasingly positioned itself as a leader in the field of online searches. In 2009, 80 % of U. S. internet searches went through Google. By 2020, that figure was almost 90 %, according to the decision. About 95 % of wireless searches used Google.
Google’s next closest competitor — Microsoft’s Bing — took up only 6 % of online searches, the ruling said.
Antitrust authorities were interested by this business supremacy, and by 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice and several state attorneys general had filed two separate lawsuits against the software large.
During the course of legal trials, dozens of witnesses were deposed, including high-ranking technology professionals. The nine-week chair test began in September 2023. May ended with closing claims.
Given that Google intends to charm and that future legal proceedings may be taking place, it’s not yet clear what the decision will mean for the business.
” We’re also in the middle of the sport, as opposed to the end of the game”, said Colin Kass, a companion in the prosecution office at Proskauer and co-head of the firm’s competitive team.
However, if the decision is upheld, it might force Google to reevaluate how it handles dealings with outsiders in order to become the default search engine, according to Jef Pearlman, clinical professor of law and chairman of the USC Gould School of Law’s intellectual property and tech rules office.
” If it stands, this will reduce their latest approach”, he said.
Legal experts believe the decision will have a less of an impact on the other pending technology federal antitrust cases because the Google case concentrates but solely on the web search market, which disqualifies it from the other lawsuits.
However, it might serve as a cautionary tale for artificial intelligence firms, which are beginning to negotiate contracts with outdoor companies to employ their systems and may encounter problems related to those encountered by Google with its default search engine agreements.
Though the AI industry is still budding,” they will be thinking of this as they pencil those offers”, Pearlman said.
___
© 2024 Los Angeles Times
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
