
The fact that she now backs one of Donald Trump’s most important procedures is the only thing we know about the polished “reintroduction of Kamala Harris.”
The current vice president attempted to pass off Trump’s plan to eliminate ideas as her own last weekend.
” When I am leader, we will remain our fight for working people of America, including to raise the minimum wage, and reduce taxes on ideas for service and hospitality staff”, she said.
The presumed political nominee’s months of campaigning have come to an abrupt end, with the unexpected campaign promise covering almost every issue on her platform, from passing” Medicare for All” to bans on fracking.
Harris is now a month and less than three months away from the first Pennsylvania votes cast as the far-left prospect campaigns without any sort of extensive policy platform, giving the press a free pass. Harris gave her position when it comes to tips, though, and the show provided another example of media discrimination that involved two completely different candidates.
The article from CBS News read,” Trump plan to free tips from income had expense$ 250 billion” when former president Trump declared his campaign to end ideas earlier this summer.
However, according to CBS,” Vice President Kamala Harris is rolling out a fresh plan place, saying she’ll battle to stop taxes on tips for support and hospitality workers.” Harris then endorsed the initiative.
In other words, Harris is a fervent advocate for the company worker while Trump is hellbent on boosting the federal deficit as a result of social patronage.
Below is NBC’s article on Trump’s news:” Ending tips taxes? Restaurant employees and proponents say it’s a small goal”. And this is the NBC article from this quarter:” Harris says she supports eliminating national taxes on ideas.” One is not like the other.
Newsweek, however, rebranded Trump’s tax plan as” Kamala Harris ‘ income proposal”.
On Tuesday, Federalist Senior Editor Mark Hemingway wrote about why the media “wo n’t discuss real campaign issues.”
” Harris however has never done a big meeting, and has only made vibrations about doing an interview’ before the end of the month,'” Hemingway wrote. ” However, major news agencies are just declaring themselves powerless prematurely. It’s sad. How’s an actual CNN title: ‘ Trump’s campaign cranked up the pressure on Harris to do a big interview, hoping to coerce her into a forum in which she’s been previously more susceptible.'”
Hemingway continued:
Why should Trump’s plan be the one to press on her around? Is n’t it the press’s job to entice politicians to step outside of their comfort zones and demand that they respond to difficult questions? And here’s a dreadful thought: If Harris is “historically prone” to doing something as simple as giving a press conference, if voters trust her to negotiate with angry international leaders?
In short, the reason lies in the fact the press “do n’t want Trump to win”.