The New York Times is shocked to learn that those who have spent the past 50+ years advocating for the sanctity of life now want to push policies that successfully ban contraception and protect unborn children from vision.
According to NYT’s National Religion Correspondent Elizabeth Dias, a “powerful battalion of conservative Christians” have “quietly laid the groundwork for their fight to restrict access to abortion as well as to I. V. F.” in an article titled” How Christian Conservatives Are Planning for the Next Battle, on I. V. F.”
According to Dias,” They are planting seeds for their ultimate goal, ending contraception from notion, both within the Republican Party and beyond.”
Pro-life advocates who support laws that promise to protect babies in their most vulnerable forms from injury and death, whether that be through pregnancy or the dumping or rejection of frozen embryos created through in vitro fertilization, have nothing off-kilter about it.
In truth, opposing IVF, or at least asking why those who go through the hundreds of thousands of IVF cycles annually in the United States get a free pass to get rid of newborn babies because they are embryos, is socially and reasonably in line with the pro-life group’s assertion that people are endowed with natural privileges from the beginning.
Dias, however, appears to see the pro-life group’s goal of stopping newborn children from killing them at the state and national levels as some sort of covert mission that is just starting to emerge in the public eye.
” As they see it, their problem extends years, not just a single political period. Their approach, which includes controlling state party platforms, regulatory language, and the definition of when life begins, is similar to what activists have used for decades to finally overturn Roe v. Wade, Dias said.
Outsiders , and , officials have both wondered whether the pro-life action will be successful in the midst of its Dobbs v. Jackson win at the U. S. Supreme Court.
Dias ‘ worry that pro-lifers are dedicated to taking a walk against the irresponsible perils of IVF in state and non-government circles like the Southern Baptist Convention suggests that the NYT is most anxious that pro-lifers will thrive once more.
The anti-abortion alliance is aware that another Trump term’s advancement would almost definitely result in state officials who support its objectives and hold strong positions, she wrote.
Dias attempted to deter action by portraying pro-life advocates as extremists who “pursued plans at the ends” to achieve their objectives, despite the list.com/2023/06/16/poll-majority-of-americans-still-reject-democrats-unlimited-abortion-agenda/” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>long list of proof that Americans favor stricter, no stricter, restrictions on abortion. On IVF especially, Dias claimed pro-lifers” face a challenging social battle since their positions are mostly unpopular and do not reflect majority opinion, mainly on I. V. F”.
Corporate media frequently exaggerate Americans ‘ support for IVF through surveys. However, a sizable portion of American people claim they disapprove of the unethical practices that Big Fertility has used as IVF’s common practice. This is a significant gap, but it is hardly ever mentioned in blogs like NYT.
The more you consider it, the more Dias ‘ broad statement appears to be an attempt to dissuade pro-lifers from changing their policy proposals to better reflect their beliefs.
Life definitely begins at vision and deserves protection, regardless of how much the NYT or Dias tries to aggravate it. Anyone who claims to be pro-life but does n’t prioritize its policy objectives around that core value will only harm the cause.
IVF is undoubtedly the next frontier for pro-life advocates to win, but the sudden revelations from NYT and another corporate media outlets is no secret. It’s merely the next natural step in a motion that claims to have a starting desire to protect unborn children.
The Federalist team author and host of The Federalist Radio Hour, Jordan Boyd. Her function has also been featured in The Daily Wire, Fox News, and RealClearPolitics. Jordan graduated from Baylor University with a political science major and a news minor. Following her on X @jordanboydtx.
