Due to her immediate silence after becoming the Democrat political candidate, Kamala Harris had been an anxious, full-throated admirer of single-payer treatments like the Bernie Sanders-Pramila Jayapal , Medicare for All , Act of 2023. This may put the federal government in total control of all elements of health care: financing, personnel and credentialling, and all medical decisions.
Presumably, if Harris attained the presidency, she would “do whatever it takes”, just as Barack Obama did with the (un ) -Affordable Care Act (ACA ), to pass her version of Medicare for All.  , Preserving only one supplier for health maintenance is the best choice. That should be the person, not the federal government.  ,
Although the details of , Medicare for All , are changing and difficult, the key elements are straightforward. D. C. promises to deliver cradle-to-grave health care at a cost of ,$ 32.6 to$ 40 trillion , over a 10-year time. The higher number is according to , Sanders.
For view, consider the following quantities. The ACA cost$ 1.76 trillion. The U. S. expended$ 4.8 trillion on health care in 2023 when the U. S. gross domestic product was$ 27.3 trillion. In 2023, the combined GDP of all countries was$ 105 trillion. Harris had pay for her single-payer health care to achieve almost half the efficiency of Earth.  ,
Medicare for All do replace all public and private healthcare plans with a second national program, with the exception of Tricare and Indian Health Service. Payment for both services and goods would be dictated by a federal health resources. Individuals may give nothing , directly , but a large sum directly, as Medicare for All would be funded by taxes. The tax problem for American may easily double given the cost of Medicare for All. In Sweden, a cradle-to-grave communist business, the best income level is 52.2 percent.
The 2023 Medicare for All plan may cover most Americans. Harris , intends , to increase about 11 million illegal participants, at least originally. The , Medicare for All administration may determine what treatment folks get, when, by whom, where, and even if. Medical independence, the freedom to choose one’s treatment, may be voided, just as in the United Kingdom ‘s , single-payer program.  ,
The , seesaw effect , describes a , decrease , in the availability of medical services when the number of government-insured people  , increases. This is because of the administrative and administrative redistribution of money from providing for patient care to providing for coverage. If all 333 million Americans were covered by  , Medicare for All, the greatest wait time for treatment is likely to increase significantly from the present , 122 time,  , to times!
With  , Medicare for All, Washington had login and permit care services — and condemn those deemed criminal, or worse, peddlers of “disinformation”. Anyone who was involved in the , repression,  , postponing, and devastating demands imposed during the , Covid scam , trembles at such anti-patient, anti-scientific federal , dictatorship.
From this surgeon’s standpoint, it is also likely that Medicare for All would generate hundreds of senior physicians to leave, making the current British” MD migration” issue look trivial. That would also lengthen wait times by years, which would mean that there wo n’t be enough doctors to train future doctors.
Harris ‘ Medicare for All program amounts to a properly controlled business — a , market , with no free-market causes. Without proper financial incentives, costs and paying fall without reduce while company suffers, excellent declines, and innovation ceases. Remember the delay ranges in the U. S. S. R.’s properly controlled business.  ,  ,
At present, federal , BARRCOME , — government, management, rules, regulations, adherence, monitoring, mandates, and police — consumes , 31 percent , to more than , 50 percent , of all U. S. health spending. Similar to how Obama used$ 716 billion from the Medicare trust fund to fund the Affordable Care Act, money is taken from the money for care.
With Medicare for All, there is a certain exponential growth in the amount of Medicare that leaves behind even more money to pay for the care of patients by nurses and doctors.  , That is the , Medicare for All , world Harris wants for America: no care providers, no money for care,  , death-by-queue, and bankruptcy for the nation.
Having only one payer for health care ( the service ) is the right idea, but it only works when the , patient, not the federal government, is the one who pays.  , Return control of health care spending to Americans. Let them make their own purchases and observe how affordable it becomes when sellers ( providers ) compete for customers ‘ money.  ,  ,
Give employees the funds that employers currently pay to insurance companies. After all, it is the employees ‘ money! Remove restrictions on health savings accounts and allow people to put their money into an unrestricted family HSA. repeal laws that govern the types of policies that insurance companies can offer. Resurrect catastrophic coverage for things like bad car accidents and cancer that cost more than most people can afford.
Let the free market function. For the small number of medically vulnerable Americans, states can create more efficient and effective safety nets than Washington’s one-size-fits-all Medicaid.
If the single-payer were the patient instead of Washington, Americans would gain timely, compassionate, affordable health care. Spending on health care would decrease, possibly by half! Instead of wasting time on pointless purchases, money would be spent wisely. Individual freedom — medical autonomy — would be restored. Federal politicians and sycophant bureaucrats would be the only ones who would suffer.
