The New York Times” The Daily” podcast episode ended with a revealing change that is important to keep in mind as Democrats prepare to hold a agreement this year.
Astead Herndon, a political writer, inquired what a possible Kamala Harris leadership might look like. ” We do n’t know what type of president she would be”, he admitted. He claimed that it does n’t really matter if it were different from Joe Biden’s presidency in any way. ” Frankly, if you ask any Democrat, they would say that’s tomorrow’s problem, and as long as she wins the election and stops Donald Trump from winning another term, they do n’t care”, he said. ” They really do n’t care. They’ll cope with that next”.
Liberals, in essence, are not interested in hearing anything that even remotely resembles Kamala’s coverage or legislative action. That’s” today’s problem”.
No know. Everyone cheering for her ( the national news media ) was perplexed when she made her first attempt late last week to present what might superficially be called “ideas.” To date, Kamala’s policy proposals are limited to axing federal taxes on gratuities ( which she stole from Trump ), a child tax credit ( which she stole from her boss ), and a$ 25, 000 giveaway for first-time home buyers ( the sort of proposal every economist not named” Paul Krugman” would laugh at ). Oh, and best of all, her request for a “federal restrictions on price measuring on foods”. She probably meant “gouging” but, yes, she said, gauging.
It’s not as though the internet is “turning on her,” as Fox News staffers frequently claim whenever a Democrat is somewhat criticized by the internet from the departed. If that were true, Forbes would have called her first-time house client giveaway terrible as heaven and unworthy of affirmation. Instead, Axios said it was “hard to see how this plan would affect]housing ] prices and availability in a meaningful way”. The Washington Post did n’t call her blurbs sophomoric and unserious, but rather “gimmicks” that are simply “misguided”.
But we do n’t have a legitimate news media, we have the American news media, so we take what we can get.
In any case, it is true that Kamala is in control, has no interest in management, and is unable to sell a perspective because she lacks it, just as it was last quarter and for the duration of the three years before that.
That’s why you keep hearing about “vibes” and” joy”. She ca n’t talk about anything else, and as the Times ‘ Astead Herndon said, they do n’t want her to. Because she ca n’t. When she tries, it’s an humiliation. Humiliations lose votes.
Democrats may drop this vote if Kamala talks about policy.
