Nothing can cause more ferocity in some parts of the world than rumors of accusations to Muhammad, the prophet of Islam. Some people in history, if any, demand this kind of ardent devotion. This commitment has recently been rekindled in India.
Advertisement
Muslims in India are clamoring the arrest of a Hindu leader because of what the Free Press Journal carefully termed “disparaging notes about Prophet Muhammad and his wife Ayesha.” The position was exceedingly uncomfortable, for” the Raza Academy, a Sunni party, which was among the groups that met the DGP]the Director General of Police], has asked Muslims to see Friday as ‘ Day of Protection in the Honour of the Prophet.'” Another Islamic organization expressed concern that the Hindu leader had not yet been detained despite the fact that India is not a” Sharia state,” and that he might face a” serious law and order problem” if he were not detained.
Why would some Muslims be so upset about what they thought were Muhammad’s accusations that they threatened to use veiled assault against them? Westerners, including observant Christians, are confounded by this problem because they never want to start burning down buildings and destroying them because of Jesus ‘ insults. Islamic apologists, however, have stated that this is because of the weakness of Christians ‘ faith, if Christians really loved Jesus, they say, they would n’t stand for his name being besmirched.
Some Muslims even contend that Muhammad himself was a truly beautiful person, making insults to him especially repulsive. According to the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research,” God combined in Muhammad the most illustrious attributes as proof that he was actually authorized by the Divine. His persona sparkled from every angle, which was evident in both those who first saw him and those who eventually read his biography. They all found in Muhammad a life of unusual honesty, faith, and righteousness that posed a formidable obstacle to any skeptic in his prophethood”. He is the persona of perfection, according to another Islamist business. We may know a lot from him, there are so many issues. His entire life serves as a guideline for us.
Advertisement
American non-Muslim scientists have abetted this idea. Karen Armstrong, in her praised” Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet”, claims whimsically that Muhammad “abjured murder and pursued a brave, inspired scheme of non-violence that was capable of Gandhi”. Another professor, Eric Ormsby, has written warmly that Muhammad “loved to laugh, we are told, to the degree that when he did laugh – certainly, not often – he did but’ until his back teeth showed’. These are endearing accounts that place a number as trustworthy and distant in time and place.
Both Armstrong and Ormsby, but, were being impressively deceptive. Muhammad not abjured crime. According to Islamic custom, Muhammad commanded the executions of many people for the offence of making fun of him and paid the murderers. He also frequently engaged in combat.
And as for Muhammad’s warm joke,” Muhammad: A Crucial Biography” tells the whole story that Ormsby omits, or may not understand. In accordance with the earliest Islamist customs, Muhammad was laughing because he had instructed one of his skilled archers to take an enemy warrior, and the enemy “fell down, exposing his buttocks,” according to the earliest Muslim customs. The hunter recounts:” I saw the Messenger of God joke therefore, until his smile could be seen”. Another version of the story, which situates it as taking position during a distinct battle, has a couple of bystanders discuss the affair after Muhammad’s hunter shoots the foe warrior:” I asked:’ What made him laugh?’ He replied:’ What he did to the male!'”
Advertisement
 ,  ,  , Related:  , As a French Imam Calls for Jihad in Muhammad’s Brand, a Hard Question May Be Asked
Ormsby’s” wonderful” tale thus turns out to be Muslim delighting in the humiliation and destruction of one of his opponents. This contrasts with the belligerence and aggression that characterize the Islamic accounts of Muhammad’s career. So, it is not surprising that the followers of Muhammad in India and other countries would so immediately threaten to kill their prophets when they were insulted. After all, that was how he himself behaved, and he is, according to the Qur’an, the Muslims ‘ “excellent example” ( 33: 21 ), to be emulated in all possible circumstances.  ,
Armstrong and Ormsby, but, represent the powerful view of Muhammad among Qatar-funded U. S. researchers now. It’s no wonder, in light of that point, that American institutions have become bastions of help for Hamas, Hizballah, and another extremism terror groups. Children on campus for over a century had been fed a regular diet of advertising, and it’s bearing grapes. ” Muhammad: A Vital Biography” is a preventative.
