Some people believe the vote of November 2024 to be unique. It is helpful to consider the reasons.
Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, British national actions have grown more significant, marking a time when British supremacy is often referred to as The End of History. Following the fall of the USSR, the decisive battle for the future of society shifted from the power fight between the East and the West to the simplest control of the West’s institutions.
Advertisement
Che Guevara and Mao’s plan to encircle the world’s locations with the land in the Third World was gone. Gramsci’s intention was to break into American institutions and lifestyle. If the enemy’s walls could only be weakened from within, they would be susceptible. The left resisted the West’s conquest would be a revolution. They proceeded with all their might and strength to accomplish this.
However, things happened that Gramsci did not anticipate. As the protest through the institutions progressed, the “progressives”– thus assured of their academic superiority– did not blow all before them. Instead they found the opposition stiffening quickly. Strange partnerships with roots in the” Working Class” and even among originally left-leaning supporters started to grow. The shock losses of 2016, Trump and Brexit, grew more than declined, as one might hope of the last-gasp weight in the expected tide of history.
The Reagan mansion that the liberals seized by coup is now in disrepair. They have a wreck in their hands. The Global World has broken apart and is now engaged in conflict. Cost control is the only remedy for prices. Worse, liberal ideas are no longer subject to assertive and yet respectable political opposition. Things have come to a head, that is what makes November 2024 so unique.
On the time of modern history, it’s showdown period, not just in America but the wider West. The fate of a society is in question, as is whether it will remain the suicide plan made by Nietzsche or whether it can resurrect itself from the demise of totalitarianism and its paltry promise. It is about whether story ends with a revolution at the European castle or continues. Elections are typically around coverage in the world. At greater events they are about society. They are about problems that no one can even express in words at their most profound times.
Advertisement
One of the biggest social changes in the past ten years has been the gradual awakening of the communist movement. HAL’s attainment of intelligence, similar to that which liberals had long believed belonged to them, was achieved by the opposition to the Gramscian coup. At first the remaining thought this Additional was just a monkey imitation of themselves, calling it “reactionary”, or “far-right” because it had to be variant, a parody of the wonderful authentic, a cheap copy of the communist master. Only the left could think, the” Nazis” could only define themselves by negation.
The liberal claim that all the rights women, minorities, and the poor enjoy” come from the left,” since they were the creative force of history, is the best example of this intellectual self-centeredness. However, the disliked Otherside does not accept credit for these things as a twisted mirror might. These good things, so the counterargument against the left goes, are not gifts from the vanguard, but emergent potentialities waiting to be discovered and revealed. It is information that comes from” God” in oldspeak ( which they dare to say ).
If Karl Marx posited that the left is the fons and origen of history, the left’s counterintuition is more entropic than the marxian dogma. It acknowledges that it has much more surprises to cover than a commissariat can handle. While left-wing diversity is only expressible as costume within a particular political line, such as Stalin’s nationalist charade korenizatsia. ” The korenizatsiia‘s main goal was to create communist cadres for all races,” said one historian. Because information can come from outside the human system, countererleft diversity is significant.
Advertisement
This explains why the contemporary left is sterile. All its supposed novelty is apparent. It has n’t said a new thing in nearly two centuries. The main goal of the progressive diversity is to create communist cadres for each intersectionality.  , This explains why Kamala Harris, despite all her newness, is actually the same old, same old. It explains why Joe Biden can be replaced by the left in a heartbeat when he was in a cognitive accident. It was as simple as removing a damaged bulb and installing a new one because his replacement is the same person but wearing a different outfit.
Although the election of November 2024 is special because the issues it addresses are crucial, it is probably incorrect to interpret its outcome as the end of history, much like when the books on human affairs were closed in 1989. It serves as a reminder that we are always beginning rather than the end of the world. Gramsci may have taken control of the castle, but it turns out that it has since moved. Things begin anew. Welcome back to the fight.
