
Research lessons for kids in California will have new improvements to the education this year designed to indoctrinate students on climate change through the horrific glass of far-left activists.
Last fall, California legislators passed Assembly Bill 285 to sanction all science classes for results 1 through 12 “include an importance on the factors and effects of climate change and strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate change”.
The California law may be implemented in total this school year.
Previous state Democrat Senate Majority Leader Gloria Romero told The Federalist she sees the new education mandates as inappropriate. ” In my experience this is not about science”, Romero said. ” This is really the existence of an ideology, a dogma. … This is essentially Democratic doctrine and the economic coalition are very large donors to the Democrat Party”.
” What they should be focusing on”, added the original senator, who chaired the Education Committee, “is to actually take a look on studying and training”.
Romero cited failing ability results in core subjects such as algebra and education. According to CalMatters, less than half of California’s kids are meeting state requirements for mathematics and language art.
California Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher called the new law “another political agenda program in the classroom]that ] is probably not going to help that dynamic”.
” We need to get back to the elements”, Gallagher told The Federalist. ” Our kids are n’t reading at grade level so let’s focus on the basics. This make sure they can learn first”.
Different states have passed similar legislation requiring individuals to become educated on climate change in ways that exaggerate what Vice President Kamala Harris and other Democrats have called the” weather issue”. At least five other states, including Connecticut, New Jersey, Maine, Illinois, and Washington State, have also added climate requirements to school curriculums, according to the Waterfront Alliance, a New York environmental group.
The New York Times ‘ project titled” Postcards From A World On Fire”, which launched three years ago, captures how Democrats and left-wing activists have catastrophized environmental problems for decades. ” Postcards from a World on Fire”, Opinion Editor Kathleen Kingsbury wrote, “makes clear, climate change is already underway. At this point, we ca n’t stop it”.
The project featured 193 stories, one from each country, to portray a planet undergoing an environmental Armageddon.
But while The New York Times is warning readers the end is near, climate-related deaths have dropped more than , 98 percent , since 1900, with weather to blame for 0.07 percent of deaths worldwide. That’s after the planet already warmed 1 degree Celsius since the , Little Ice Age , century of the 1800s.
The bombardment of doomsday climate commentary has meanwhile contributed to widespread environmental anxiety among children. In December 2021, The Lancet published a , study  , from a team of nine researchers, including psychologists, environmental scientists, and psychiatrists, who surveyed 10, 000 people aged 16 to 25 across 10 countries about their” climate anxiety” and their governments ‘ responses to environmental issues. Seventy-five percent reported feeling the “future is frightening”, and 83 percent said humanity “failed to take care of the planet”. The study also reported that nearly half said their “feelings about climate change negatively affected their daily life and functioning”.
The study also found that fewer and fewer young people are willing to reproduce, reportedly out of fear of climate change. Nearly 40 percent reported that their anxiety about the climate made them “hesitant to have children” . , According , to a 2020 survey from Morning Consult, one in four childless adults cited climate change as a reason to refrain from having children.
The California law implemented this school year would n’t bar a teacher from assigning classwork that contradicts the left-wing narrative around climate change. Romero said such teachers, however, “would n’t last in the classroom” considering” the politics of the union”.
” There would be classroom change over the controversy of climate change”, she said.