Millions of Americans tuned into ABC News on Tuesday for what was supposed to be the first national conversation of the vote. Instead, they witnessed a one-sided present demo where ABC News served as the judge, jury, and murderer, as pointed out by Turning Point USA Founder Charlie Kirk on X.
David Muir and Linsey Davis of ABC News ambushed former president Donald Trump for 90 minutes while running election meddling for evil president Kamala Harris. More than addressing soaring inflation, rising gas prices, false employment numbers, and the dangerous frontier crises, the Bobbsey Sisters decided to focus on cliches while Harris got away with murder— yes, death.
Harris was never required to answer for her boundary issue, which has resulted in the brutal rape and murder of honest Americans, but Trump was.
Muir tried, for example, to button Jan. 6 on Trump but quickly omitted that Trump evidently called for a “peaceful” rally that morning.
“ Is there anything you regret about what you did on]Jan. 6]”? Muir asked.
Trump was once again put on the defense and forced to spend precious time setting the record straight: All he “did” was give a speech urging supporters to “peacefully and patriotically” “make]their ] voices heard”.
But Muir decided Trump’s answer was n’t yet satisfactory, perhaps because Trump had n’t said anything that the propaganda press could later use to vilify him.
” It’s a very simple question as we move forward toward another vote”, Muir said during his cross-examination. Is there anything you regret doing that day that you regret? Yes or no”?
However, if Muir had been more concerned about “officers coming under attack,” he may have grilled Harris about her backing a portfolio that helped victims of the deadly riots of 2020. Instead, Muir used the Jan. 6 protest, which saw a Capitol police officer fatally assault Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt, as an opportunity to shove Harris simple questions and duck responsibilities for her tragic plans and years in office.
Additionally, Muir and Linsey slammed Trump with false facts while letting Harris hurl untruths that had already been proven.
” This consider Charlottesville, where there was a mob of people carrying tiki lamps, spewing anti-Semitic love, and what did the president then, at the time state”? Harris asked, claiming that former senator Trump said” ‘ There were good people on each side ‘”, Harris said. Here, she once again, as Biden did in his disastrous debate performance weeks ago, “repeat]ed ] a long-debunked claim regarding Trump’s remarks”, as The Federalist previously reported.  , She also falsely claimed Trump said there would be a “bloodbath” if” the result of this vote is not to his liking”. However, this was yet another misunderstanding of Trump’s earlier statements, which stated that if he were not in office, he would place a” 100 percent tax on every single automobile” that imports.
Muir even letting Harris lay about the Supreme Court immunity ruling, late-term abortions, and Trump’s repeated condemnation of white supremacy continuous, forcing Trump to proactively defend himself against the blatant lies knowing Muir — the judge, jury, and executioner — only cared to “fact-check” Trump.
It was a mocking night because as Americans choose to put food on the table or keep a roof over their heads, ABC News ‘ in-house Harris campaign staffers prioritized grilling Trump about the 2020 election and his obscene remarks over questioning Harris on how she would bring relief. While Harris was able to skate past her four years of failure, the moderators were confined to a show trial where Trump was forced to defend every word he’s ever said.
But that was the propaganda press’s sole goal: to undermine Trump’s chances of winning by making him defend pointless issues, providing ammunition for the media while praising Harris.
Perhaps we should n’t be so surprised by the lopsided coverage. Media Research Center released a study that analyzed” all 100 campaign stories that aired on]Muir’s ] World News Tonight]on ABC ] from the day Harris entered the race ( July 21 ) through September 6″, and purportedly “found 25 clearly positive statements about Harris from reporters, anchors, voters or other non-partisan sources, with zero negative statements — none”, as The Federalist previously reported.
” That computes to a gravity-defying 100 % positive spin score for the Vice President”, the report claims, adding that Muir’s coverage was 93 percent negative” spin score” toward Trump.
Brianna Lyman is a correspondent for The Federalist on elections. With a degree in International Political Economy, Brianna received her degree from Fordham University. Her work has been featured on Newsmax, Fox News, Fox Business and RealClearPolitics. Follow Brianna on X: @briannalyman2
