The Washington Post has long been the Democratic National Committee’s official website, displaying its fake, self-righteous honesty like a particularly unpleasant pull queen. There is no hiding its partiality, as there not hiding the dude over deep under the hair, makeup, and shoes.  ,
You expect a publishing with a communist angle when you work for and hire people from the Aaron Sorkin School of Journalism.  ,
However, in recent years, the Post has changed its allegiance as a proponent of the First Amendment for a place on the cheer squad of the speech-silencing action. Reporters Sarah Ellison,  , Amy Gardner, and , Clara Ence Morse captained the latest booster march with a strike part headlined” Elon Musk’s false election claims reach millions and concern election officials”.
‘ Uniquely Dangerous’ ,
Beyond the obvious and vast disdain for anything that remotely resembles election integrity, the piece’s current theme is that Musk and his takeover of Twitter, then X, are both harmful to elections officials and a threat to democracy. For those who have n’t followed along this protracted election season, the Democrat Party playbook is directly adapted from the book.  ,
The article frantically indicts using “experts” to give the appropriate message, as the Post frequently does, because “experts say Musk is truly dangerous as a purveyor of misinformation because his electric following extends well beyond the social realm and into the technology and investment sectors, where his business accomplishments have earned him credibility. We do not realize who the majority of the “more than two hundred election officials and experts” interviewed are, of course because they have spoken to the publication’s reporters in an effort to “protect themselves and their organizations in a divided vote season.”
These are the same sort of “experts” who have huge assisted the leftist news channel that tampered with their esteemed business advertising kids by slamming the Hunter Biden laptop story. Never until nearly two years after did the Post join the New York Times in confirming that the older Biden’s political problem enterprise’s disturbing letters were true.  ,
However, Musk is credited with producing “false and deceptive election posts,” which “add to the glut of false information troubling voting authorities across the country.”
Give us a tear.  ,
He Reinstated Accounts,
The computer story may not have been smothered by Twitter at the hands of the really dangerous strong position, and things might have been a lot different if Musk had owned the social media platform in 2020. Under the dementia-ridden President Joe Biden and his cackling lieutenant, Vice President Kamala Harris, it’s possible that Americans would n’t have been stuck with the economic and national security disasters they have experienced.  ,
The Washington Post hit job lament, however, was caused by the deep cuts in staff that Musk made to maintain standards on the website. Standards? The norm was to suppress conservative speech and, in many cases, facts that Donald Trump-hating politicians and fervent supporters found objectionable. Musk” courted major conservative figures”, the article moans. God forbid! Musk introduced opposing voices to the leftist line promoted on Twitter. That sounds like the terrible resumption of free speech.  ,
” He reinstated accounts previously banned for violating the platform’s rules, including Donald Trump’s, and promised to usher in a less restrictive era”, the reporters write. Musk, you monster! How could you permit the leader of one of the two major political parties to speak freely on the social network you paid a lot for?  ,
The Post is really ticked off by the fact that the man who once admired the left for his electric cars and who once supported Democrats for president is n’t doing so at the moment. In fact, Musk had the audacity to post” a photo of the Republican presidential candidate, face bloodied, with his fist in the air, and endorsed him for 2024 and welcomed him back to X with a live-streamed conversation between the two,” following the assassination attempt on Trump in July, which the left and its press have remembered as an inconvenient truth of this election.
And then there’s the bridge too far for the Post: Trump’s pledge to put Musk at the head of a government efficiency commission.  ,
Election Integrity Deniers
All that free speech and courting of “major conservative figures” makes Musk an “election denier”, to the folks at the Post. The fact that the multibillionaire is using his powerful bullhorn to criticize those who oppose election integrity is something that the coexisting crowd ca n’t tolerate.  ,
Musk is accused of repeatedly making claims in the article that” Democrats are “importing” undocumented people to vote in the upcoming election.” Let’s take a quick look at what has transpired over the course of the last three and a half years under Dem control of the White House and the U.S. Senate. The Biden administration has allowed an absolute invasion of illegal immigrants, an estimated 10 million pouring over the U. S. border. The same administration has run a covert campaign to use federal agencies to register left-leaning voters under the auspices of executive fiat.
On their voter rolls, state elections officials reported thousands of noncitizens. Voter registration forms are being sent to foreign nationals all over the country, particularly in critical swing states.  ,
But Musk is spreading “disinformation”, say the Post and the same people operating the targeted voter drives. They love to use that word, “disinformation”. And” cheap fakes”. The same “news” organizations that kept promoting the White House’s claim that videos of a cognitively slipping Joe Biden were nothing but” cheap fakes” and Republican-spun “disinformation” are the same media outlets that wagging their fingers at Musk.
As my Federalist colleague Margot Cleveland pointed out this week on Musk’s social media platform,” Even]Democratic ] party leaders are admitting now they want illegals to be able to vote” . ,
When the majority of House Democrats voted against the SAVE Act, a bill that required documented proof of citizenship in federal elections, and when Biden threatened to veto it, they said it was true.  ,
Democracy Dies in Silence
The Post’s headline piece is more of the same, criticizing Michigan Fair Elections, Cleta Mitchell, and her Election Integrity Network, as well as the Post’s hit piece. Mitchell and the groups have been in the know about and identified issues with voter rolls, mail-in ballots, and a slew of leftist “voter rights” activists who have fought against election integrity laws.  ,
They despise Musk and anyone who goes against the company’s claim that there is no voter fraud and that the 2020 election was” the most secure in American history.” Democrats go about destroying representative democracy by politically destroying law enforcement and courts, and obliterating competition from within the party power structure, according to The Post.  ,
In the corporate media, X and Musk pose a threat to both them and their customers. Election officials are getting some pesky questions about “false” information they’re seeing on X, as the Post article notes. That’s disruptive to the status quo, a threat to the cabal in power. The First Amendment, they believe, is no excuse for ideas they’ve ruled “disinformation”.  ,
Democracy Dies in Darkness indeed.  ,
Matt Kittle covers The Federalist’s senior elections coverage. An award-winning investigative reporter and 30-year veteran of print, broadcast, and online journalism, Kittle previously served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.
