The political debate on September 10 went as planned. Summed away, it was Sappy and the Blob mound on Grouchy.
The swarmy and deceptive Vice President Kamala Harris preened, posed, and proffered clear phrases.
Advertisement
The ABC administrators demonstrated that they were blatantly biased.
And a furious previous president, Donald Trump, once more, said he was very sensitive and easily triggered.
Harris’s directions were not to discuss her plan. She always defended abandoning policies that she had embraced as a longtime, self-confessed, “woke” “radical”.
Otherwise, Harris’s threefold strategy was easy sufficiently– and it mostly worked.
One, goad Trump as a fool and discriminatory. Then smile and telephone for unity, compassion, and an end to such name-calling.
Harris’s commands were to zero in on hair-trigger irrelevancies that may inspire and ramble the thin-skinned Trump. But, Harris claimed his huge demonstrations were problems, crackpot– and worst of all, boring! — because she falsely claimed that exhausted waiters had left first.
All that was missing from her child putdowns was past president Barack Obama’s profanity in his earlier convention speech, which allegedly resulted from tiny testicles for Trump.
In Harris’s upside-down, projectionist earth, ex-president Trump caused the Biden-Harris tragic skedaddle from Afghanistan.
He was charged with being primarily responsible for the consequences of the world COVID-19 plague, which claimed over 100 million lives.
And apparently Trump also made fun of Vladimir Putin, who had oddly attacked his neighbors under Bush, Obama, and Biden but not Trump.
Advertisement
Harris mocked Trump’s firms, claiming he was a loss. Those strategies succeeded, as a rattled Trump missed simple rebuttals of Harris’s dressed duplicity.
The outcome was an off-topic protection of the size of his demonstrations and his money rather than an simple expose of her rests.
Two, Harris reliably once more changed herself.
She erased fully her upper-middle course, wealthy upbringing, as a child of two Doctorates.
No mention was made of the fact that her extreme political career was shrewdly gifted by her engaged Bay-Area left-wing reporters, Wille Brown, who was more than 30 years her senior.
Otherwise, Harris became a middle-class infant of a struggling small woman.
To plaster that fraud, Harris had then insist that she was always a border bird, supported drilling, and was tough on crime. She claimed she always rallied the government to bail out harsh protesters during the 2020 looting, arson, and violent presentations.
Harris promised to respond to questions in depth, but he never did.
Rather, she recited scripted talking factors to prevent explaining her appropriate transformation.
As the existing sin president, Harris went mum on her apparent failure over the last three decades– or in the following five months– to adopt her “way ahead” policies.
Three, everything else in the conversation was outsourced to the ABC “moderators”, David Muir and Linsey Davis.
Advertisement
Both allegedly calculated that if it was a topic of whether to offendly aid Harris or appear intellectually and professionally fair, it would be a wise, political decision.
So, the two fact-checked Trump regularly, but not Harris again, and tried to weft the intensity of the discussion.
Harris, without delay or modification, recycled the old, discredited lies about Charlottesville, “bloodbath”, the 2025 initiative, and Trump’s supposed help for a federal restrictions on abortion.
The frowning editors directed Trump to answer the questions asked when he generally veered off topic. Harris never did or was always asked to.
Conversation rules presumably outlawed hot-mic breaks. But Harris was exempted.
Worse of all were the uneven issues.
Muir and Davis fixated on the January 6 provocation. They ignored Harris ‘ national streamed warning that the violent protests of 2020 may continue after Election Day and that they would continue as a “movement.”
The two fact-checkers remained mum even after Harris lied that police on January 6 were killed by protestors on a day that appeared to be worse than September 11 ( when 3, 000 Americans were killed ).
Does the contest be altered by the discussion?
Possibly not.
Harris confirmed that she was slicker. But her habitual happy-face smiling has been seen over the last 90 times as facilitating her shallowness, browbeating, and denials.
Advertisement
Trump reestablished that he is fiery, quick-tempered, and quickly provoked. However, the nation has already been aware of all of that for the past nine times.
Half of the country believed that Trump’s loose-cannon outburst was directed at cheap politicians and the fusion media, and the debate good confirmed that opinion.
The sentimental Harris won the photos, the grumpy Trump good the issues.
But the actual morons were ABC and its two political administrators, Muir and Davis.
Both successfully outperformed CNN’s renowned political damage of the 2012 conversation between Mitt Romney and Obama.
Muir and Davis confirmed their brazen prejudices, just as we do not recall anything else about that sight other than Crowley’s career-ending interventions to help Obama. They sought to thread a conversation, disgraced their community, and offered a great reminder why such press “moderators” should never be allowed anywhere near political debates.
