Someone Is Still Hacking the Trump Campaign, Probably Iran

The Iranian theocrats do n’t want to kill Donald Trump, they just want to. They keep trying to read his emails, which is both offensive and obscene in the framework of Trump’s presidential campaign.

Henry Stimson, the secretary of state during World War I, ordered the shutting of America’s” Black Chamber”, the predecessor of the NSA. ” Boys do not read each other’s mail”, Stimson sniffed. Since then, things have changed, and now you can read men’s letters, listen to their phone calls, and watch them spy on their sexual lives.

Iran is continuing to steal into Donald Trump’s plan. What they’re getting is kept under wraps in American media sources. Yet far-left websites like Popular Information, which was run by previous ThinkProgress writer Judd Legum, have refrained from making the tricks public. The explanation? According to them,” the stolen components do not offer the consumer any important new insights about Trump or his plan.” But, on balance, the related factors argue against publishing”.

In other words, the stolen substance contains nothing particularly interesting, so we’re going to prevent the furore that may result from publishing anything from the exploit and keep it to ourselves.

USA Today:

Legum wrote that he would not release the Trump paperwork he’d received, but that he would provide details on how the” Robert” persona approached him after his letters to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign president were hacked by Russia and made available by Wikileaks.

Before Trump chose Vance as his running mate,” Robert” first sent Legum the cover sheet of a dossier compiled on Ohio Sen. JD Vance in February.

A 382-page report on North Dakota governor was ultimately sent to Legum along with a 271-page Vance dossier, along with other similar documentations on two different potential Donald Trump running companions. Doug Burgum and a 550-page report on Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, both from next spring. All of the documentation, he said, were marked” Wealthy &amp, Confidential”.

Bagginess explained a notice from Trump’s counsel to the New York Times from September 15 that was more than a fortnight after the initial steal was made public, even though the Vance document is outdated information.

Iran also has entry to Trump’s campaign team computers. &nbsp,

The question is why the Washington Post, the New York Times, Politico, and other news sites that shared the hacked Hillary Clinton emails wo n’t share the Trump emails. &nbsp,

Washington Post Executive Editor Matt Murray, for example, said he” thought about who was likely to be leaking the]Trump ] documents, what the motives of the hacker might have been, and whether this was truly newsworthy or not”. However, the report was aware in 2016 that Russia was probably responsible for the documents ‘ hack and was utilizing them to sway the 2016 presidential election. However, the Washington Post’s coverage included passages that were not, by any reasonable definition,” certainly newsworthy” .&nbsp,

It’s a different planet in 2024 compared to 2016. Before the election, it was n’t known that Russia had hacked the letters in an effort to influence the outcome. Leaks made the messages public, and media outlets considered the details to be fair game.

Trump and his software staff must address this issue and put an end to tricks. The internet has been anxious to discharge something, but that may shift if the tricks continue.

Source credit