Instructors at ASU criticize” bright exceptionalism” in intellectual studies and assert that the condition has manipulated black history.
During an” Appropriation Series” at Arizona State University last year, two faculty members criticized” white rights” of Shakespeare and the state’s arrangement of black background.
The researchers are pushing for more “diverse” tones to be included in the education and organizational structure. They also spoke to eleven ASU learners in the market and other faculty members via Zoom during the board.
According to English Professor Ruben Espinosa, Shakespeare’s tradition has been manipulated to the point of isolation and viewed from the perspective of” white superiority.”
He said that for the Jan. 6 “insurrectionists” at the U. S. congress, Shakespeare represents a symbol of” white individualism” and “racial hierarchy”.
The organizers did not write to different organizations like the Library of Congress to inform them of the protest’s administrators, he said, but they did send a letter to the Folger Shakespeare Library, the nation’s largest Shakespeare set, located one stop from the U.S. Capitol.
Espinosa claimed that this act reflects the insurrectionists ‘ view of Shakespeare as an” white superiority,” so they felt it was crucial to keep the library safe during the protest.
” Shakespeare sits atop of that racist order. He is the embodiment of what they consider pale exceptionalism…and this is why he’s valuable”, the English teacher said.
Espinosa furthermore argued that the Shakespeare Library’s founding management and first speech reflect anti-immigrant and light exceptionalist sentiments in its history.
He claimed that Joseph Quincy Adams, the first collection director, saw the establishment as” a survival of the language of the American individuals at a time when immigrants are coming in like locusts to steal our lifestyle, to steal our speech.”
” This is the way he imagined immigration”, Espinosa said.
” It kind of has this source in anti-immigrant views, right, all the way to January 6th, when we think about that white uniqueness, and this idea of a kind of light possession of Shakespeare”, he said.
The scholar added that there is frequently opposition when people who “do not look the part” ( meaning they are n’t white ) are appointed to leadership positions in the Shakespearean field.
Shakespeare would have never appeared to him as a dark or non-white man throughout his entire career, he claimed.
Espinosa claimed that after the demise of George Floyd, the Public Theater in New York had 30 black players recite the popular” To Be or Not To Get” soliloquy from Hamlet.
Less: ASU hosts an event promoting polyamory with “live experience experts.”
Victoria Day, the occasion consultant, declined to answer questions from The College Fix via message about the goal of the occasion and the concept of budget. Otherwise, she directed The Fix to a recording of the occasion.
Curtis Austin, a scholar and associate chairman of the Humanities Institute who also served on the board, claimed that the condition has previously appropriated dark past, claiming that it presents itself as a supporter of civil rights movements while actively opposing them.
” But the fact of the matter is, the federal government, as well as state and local governments, pushed back very hard against movement activists and the movement itself”, Austin said.
” This is one way the state has been able to appropriate the history, the meaning, and, what I claim, the legacy of the movement”, he said.
He cited films including” The Help”,” Mississippi Burning”, and” The Butler” as examples of media that distort the narrative by focusing on” white saviors” and” white redemption” rather than “black agency” and leadership. They “have appropriated the black freedom struggle”, he said.
” This appropriation is problematic because it reinforces the notion that the fight for civil rights required white intervention and leadership while downplaying the role of black agencies, where in fact…it’s the state, whether it’s the federal government, the state government, or local governments that’s actually pushing back against the movement”, Austin said.
He claimed that the state is trying to” control what the world sees, what it believes, and how it affects black people themselves in terms of the struggle for black freedom” by appropriating black history.
The panel on appropriation this semester at ASU was the second of two.
” What constitutes cultural appropriation, and when is it unethical? Should we adopt voices other than our own, and if so, what factors must be considered in advance? reads the event description.
MORE: Christian professor’s ‘ Intro to Christianity ‘ class torpedoed at ASU
IMAGE: Gabrielle Temaat for , The College Fix
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
