Donald Trump was found guilty in February by a Manhattan prosecutor for manipulating his shield value and the value of his real estate holdings to get favorable rates from banks and carriers.  ,
Advertisement
For two reasons, New York Attorney General Letitia James wanted to prosecute what was a popular practice in the competitive New York City real estate market. Second, Trump spent ten times overstating his money. Next, the trial judge found no contempt for Trump or his sons, who were the other accused, in the case. Apparently, the judge did n’t like the fact that the Trumps failed to grovel.  ,
The prize was that Trump is a Republican candidate and James is a Democrat. Nuff said.
The New York Court of Appeals has presently heard the case, though. The five-judge board expressed doubts regarding AG James ‘ application of the particular fraud act she used to impose it on the former president.
Some users of the five-judge appeals court panel’s oral arguments on Thursday suggested that Tish James, the attorney general of New York, had violated the state’s anti-fraud act by utilizing it in her lawsuit against Trump. Associate Justice David Friedman questioned whether her company had ever used the act to “upend a private firm deal that was between extremely powerful partners” as Deputy Solicitor General Judith Vale, arguing for James, began her starting remarks.
After Friedman finished, Associate Justice Llinet Rosado added,” and little to no impact on the public platform.
The judges ‘ questions echoed one of Trump’s main lines of defense: He has argued that no one was harmed by the inflated prices.
Advertisement
” I think you hear underneath all these issues, the issue of vision creep”, Associate Justice Peter Moulton said. Has the act in question, 6312, “morphed into everything that it was not meant to do”?
” I will stress, your pride, that this does have damage to the people and to the industry”, Vale said in reply.
Trump’s attorney D. John Sauer argued that there were” no subjects, no issues”. Even some of the magistrates who argued that a crime was committed are unable to identify the victim. The prices occurred in a personal business transaction, so, no one was injured in any way as a result of Trump’s fake pricing.
Vale was surrounded by the courts of the appeals court. They inquired if there had ever been a situation in which the attorney general had filed a lawsuit under the condition professional rules.  ,
In addition to the assertions that the supposed prey had the authority and legitimate right to discover the reportedly distorted matters by conducting its own due devotion, where the supposed victim was advised to conduct its own due diligence and bring its own conclusions by the supposed victim, through written disclaimers, and where the victim never complained about any fraud, Associate Justice David Friedman posed a number of questions to Vale.
Advertisement
It did n’t get a whole lot better for the state from there. When the harm on the public marketplace was minimal, a second judge questioned the harm. The attorney general was n’t required to get involved with the case because a third judge said it sounded like it might involve private actors in a potential commercial dispute. Additionally, a fifth judge on the five-judge panel expressed concern about “mission creep,” or whether a state law was violated in a way that was n’t intended.
I can tell from reading the transcript that the chances are better than 50-50 for the court to either significantly lower the judgment or toss the entire case.
