Illegal , DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith wants Twitter prisons to become real. His latest election-interfering lawsuit against Donald Trump basically contends that his free talk is defamatory.
Advertisement
Democrats have been making accusations that election results are dishonest or illegal since Andrew Jackson, but the issue is about as ancient as the United States itself. Consider when Hillary Clinton and her followers asserted that the 2016 presidential election was a scam? Smith allegedly does n’t because his latest lawsuit against Trump contends that Trump’s speech about election integrity and election fraud is justification for prosecuting and indicting the former president.
Americans are protected by the First Amendment when they criticize the government and votes. In America, you have always been allowed to claim that you thought votes were false, whether that is genuine or not. It’s a First Amendment straight. When the Democrats ‘ most formidable opponent uttered it, Smith wants to criminalize that constitutionally protected free speech. But if you think it will prevent with Trump, think again. The Democrat party has evolved into the censorship business complex‘s party, the party opposed to free speech.
Both Smith and the Harris-Walz seat want to silence Trump and the Biden-Harris management want to silence American. Did n’t Tim Walz just support and defend censorship during the vice presidential debate, and did n’t John Kerry simply describe the First Amendment as a “block”?
Advertisement
For Our Celebs:  , Kerry’s Anti-Free Speech, Pro-Globalist Rhetoric Is Symbolic of Democrats
Beneath are two small passages from , Smith’s processing:
The throughline of these efforts was deceit: the defendant’s and co-conspirators ‘ knowingly false claims of election fraud …]Trump ] used his Twitter account to undermine public confidence in the electoral system, spread false claims of election fraud, attack those speaking the truth…]and ] marshal his supporters ‘ anger…
Smith is also trying to persuade Trump to intentionally incite a harsh riot, which is, of course, fake. Trump repeatedly demanded peace on January 6 and had requested National Guard troops ahead of time, a request that Democratic officials rejected. And suddenly, “false statements” are not a murder. They are a proper under the Constitution.
Democrats usually operate in an absurd twice standard. Smith’s part as particular counsel was now ruled unlawful, and his explanation is absurd. Americans, and particularly Democrats, have long made accusations of election fraud (occasionally and for a reason; Democrats have long cheated in elections ). Two well-known Democrats, Clinton and Stacey Abrams, have consistently vilified the poll benefits.
Advertisement
Some of Clinton’s supporters, including politicians, pleaded with the Electoral College to reverse the 2016 poll results and support Clinton over Trump as president. Trump previously called for an “insurrection” on Jan. 6, 2021, despite what Jack Smith pretends, but Clinton’s followers definitely called for a political rebellion. Being a so-called “election sceptic” in the Democrat group gained more popularity after 2016 than it does now in the Democratic party.
Jack Smith is the one attempting to tamper in a U. S. vote, no Donald Trump. This most recent filing is only one more instance of the Democrats ‘ desperate legal fight against Trump.