The’ participation of more social professionals ‘ needed at NASA, etc.
Another scientific from another university warns about continuing to explore human space because of its “imperialist mindset.”
Savannah Mandel, an “outer place anthropologist” and PhD candidate at Virginia Tech, adds to what appears to be a well-known debate about space research.
According to Virginia Tech News,  , Mandel ‘s , book” Ground Control: An Argument for the End of Human Space Exploration” argues that “rushing to send more humans to space ]… ] mirrors an imperialist mindset that harms Earth’s humanity and environment”.
Mandel ( pictured ) said the space industry is “highly bureaucratic, highly politicized, and highly technical”, and the more she learned the more she began to question the utility of continued manned space operations.
She said she wants a” widespread shift” in human-led area work, one of which is” the addition of more social experts” at NASA and abroad.
Mandel noted that when she was employed at Spaceport America, she had “list all the music stars going on Virgin Galactic flights” and would also take note of the “poverty records for the local area.”
” It was quite a dramatic contrast”, she said. When I first started writing about space policy and science in Washington, D.C., I realized how military area exploration was and how imperial the rhetoric surrounding it was.
MORE: A professor of physics reminds us to “admit we live under indigenous clouds.”
When looking at space-related/technology companies and organizations, Mandel said she asks” What is influencing this? Who is influencing this? What principles and principles underlie this”?
From the content:
Growing interest in resource removal, such as room mining, is one of my biggest worries. When resources are recovered from space mining, I want to know how they will be managed, distributed, and controlled. Will the mining of these sources result in more wealth disparities? Are the wealthy going to become richer from these resources if only the wealthy have access to them, whereas others wo n’t at all?
Another problem is who has a message in space-related debate. Is people place inquiry a global or local conversation? When we set up colonies, what do they signify? What are the repercussions of that? Will they be a way to establish place and control over property? There are many moral issues to be addressed regarding how those who are left on Earth are affected by mortal space exploration.
In a 2019 content, Mandel referred to this as the” Elysium Effect,” which is probably referring to the 2013 Matt Damon-led science fiction film about a large room town in Earth orbit that is restricted to the rich elite.
The space anthropologist did point out that she supports continued unmanned space missions, but she did not go into great detail about how robotic and artificial intelligence ( A.I. ) technologies are influencing space mining from celestial bodies like the moon and asteroids.
Five years ago, Mandel said,” I love area, but I really want us to not keep Earth in the dust because we’re moving so quickly into an intergalactic coming.” ” In Kim Stanley Robinson’s job ]see these ], the main character usually ends up back on Earth wondering,’ Why did we leave Earth, this amazing planet we were born into and designed for?'”
Greater:’ Individualism’ is example of ‘ white dominance’ in astrophysics: professor
IMAGE: Savannah Mandel/X
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Twitter.